What exactly did you dominate on? You are stating your own opinion which is clearly not backed up by facts.It was. And it (Kolarov to be more specific) helped them win us. We clearly did dominant that match.
I am just stating statistical facts.
Both teams had an equal number of chances to score.
Dont complain about Kolarov playing if he was specifically signed by Inter to cover for the CB position. And considering Skriniar was on the outs with Conte during that time I doubt he would have started over D'Ambrosio.
Plus, you cant keep saying you have the best depth in Serie A and then simultaneously moan about missing players. I mean, Inter fans keep saying we have shit depth, and yet we have managed to stay on top regardless of the ridiculous injury crisis. I mean, we had to start a 20 yr old RB who has never played a professional game at CB. In key games too.
And also the thing about penalties., arguably one of the most stupid arguments in football. How many of the penalties we got were unjustified? Its only natural to get more penalties the more chances you have in the box. We have also had stonewall penalties not given, not to mention ridiculous penalty decisions against us.
Can you honestly say Inter would have coped without Lukaku as well as Milan have done without Ibra? Brozovic - Bennacer? De Vrij - Kjaer? Lautaro - Rebic?
Heck, we had almost 7 first teamers out against Juve and had to play Calabria in the midfield. Folks forget how ridiculous the injury crisis is at Milan, especially for a team with a supposedly shit depth.
Milan won the game against Inter fair and square. And if tomorrow Inter wins against Milan, they would have also deserved to win it.
Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk