Not hate, but a lot of confusion. Greenwood is rather talented but he's not worth Onana's shoelaces.Alright hear me out.. I'm going to get a lot of hate for this:
Straight swap Onana for Greenwood.
Rapists aren't welcome at this club....Alright hear me out.. I'm going to get a lot of hate for this:
Straight swap Onana for Greenwood.
I don't know why people keep repeating that. The guy is expensive for our budget. If we bring him back and have a successful season the club want to bring him back again and probably make his loan permanent, and we would be left with another +30 years old with heavy salary (probably the highest earner in the squad). And if we fail the season, we have spent another significant part of our budget on this guy that we don't even own and we should look to replace him with no money again.On paper there is no one better than Lukaku for what we can afford financially.
That being said I would have a very stern conversation with Big Rom/Chelsea on the following conditions that is non-negotiable
1) Salary reduced by 60%
2) 20M fee automatically based on KPI
Otherwise fuck off. And we get some pooft3r instead.
Where is Dumfries going? You know something we don’t?If we take Dembele for free, then we could take Djalo and Emil Holm from Dumbfries sale money.
To Aston Villa in 2 weeks, you will see )Where is Dumfries going? You know something we don’t?
for 16 million pounds with a 2mil bonus only paid out if Aston Villa qualify for the Champions League.To Aston Villa in 2 weeks, you will see )
It is quite narrow-sighted to say no one is less expensive than him.
I don't know why people keep repeating that. The guy is expensive for our budget.
Are you talking about Arsenal's player? Because I read that they want around 50mln for him. This is maybe not expensive, but definitely not for Inter.Balogun makes sense and he is not expensive, young and salary would be ok.Seems we can't get rid of Correa, so we will have Lautaro, Thuram, Balogun, and Correa . Younger and cheaper.