I tried to be a little Mean Man here!
Anyway I think Moroniho can resist here for maximum 2 years. I still rate Hiddink better than Moroniho because he was succeed almost everywhere he's gone in these years. Just look at what he has done to a helpless team like Russia.
What about Jose? Didn't he succed wherever he went also?
Leira - 3rd place in Portugal
Porto - Leagues titles, UEFA, CL, Portuguese cups
Cheslea - LEague titles, English cups, twice in semi final of CL
Isn't that the same story? The difference between them is like Stefan said, Jose is coaching on top scene(lets say that is Porto) for just 6 years now. Just 6 years! He is a phenomenon. And only 45 years old.
Where did you get Mourinho's 12 major titles? I count 8, that is if you count English league cups. And what kind of an argument is that anyway? How about you take a look at what Hiddink does to every single team he coaches. He makes them achieve result while making them play the game like it was supposed to be played. He's been doing that for 20 years.
Mourinho does the same resultwise but the difference is his teams are boring as fuck to watch, and he hasn't achieved half of what Hiddink has.
Leading South-Korea to semifinal in WC, Australia to QF, and Russia to semifinal in EC, and making them play great is equal to winning the Champions league 3 times, or at least not far from it.
What's even more impressive is he's done all that within six years. Mourinho is great and maybe he will achieve what Hiddink has someday but claiming they have achieved the same is ridiculous, to say the least.
Like I said, Hiddink was great with NT, he always is, but coaching Korea, Australia(!), Russia. You say they are favourites to win the Cups, like Chelsea, Porto(at home ground) or Inter? People, give me a break.
I would put them at par at best, but no way someone can say Hiddink is better over him.
4. He doenst go to uncle Abrahimovic for money after every 2 games.
5. He knows how to handle pressure. Mourinho only knows act tough in pressure less situations. There never really is pressure from the fans or media, when you are manager of a football club in England.
6. He has been successful with every country/club he has coached in the last 8 years.
7. He has performed miracles like taking S.korea to the WC semis or taking Australia to the World cup, and then to the round of 16, and now with Russia. Miracles Mourinho cant even dream of.
You got to be shitting me Shahz. Really.
How many times people were talking here about the trasfers of Jose at Chelsea. Didn't you miss the part where Jose wanted just 1, 2 players in his last year at chelsea ?! It's all the time the same story. Ballack and Sheva, blah, blah, blah.
Also, I'm sure he wanted players for 30 Milion every 2 weeks at Porto too.
ps. And what does "astute" mean ?
And LOL at the fifth sentence. WTH man ? Yeah, there's never a pressure, when you go to the club, and your first words are "I'm the special one". I'm sure :] The club where Chelsea with Abramovic MUST HAVE SUCCEDED both at national level and international level.
Now I'm sure Korea and Australia media were saying before WC that if Hiddink won't deliever them the cup, he is fired LOL.
And maybe Jose wasn't succesfull with every club he coached either ? And the so called "miracles" ? Leira to go to the third place, and I'm sure Porto is winning CL cups on a daily basis.
I have to talk down of Hiddink, which I didn't want to do, because I rate him high, but comparing Hiddink, to a 45 year old coach, who is a phenomenon if one would see his coaching steps since. I won't ever deny the fact Hiddink is playing one of the best football a man can watch, but in the end what counts is result.