Where are the West Ham rumors? I've literally seen none of those. Some very vague mentions of them. Someone like Di Marzio would know by now if that's a real thing.They probably want West ham or some other team that offered more money
https://www.google.com/amp/s/sempre...-lazar-samardzic-transfer-to-inter-milan/amp/ . I know it' s not highly reputable source but for me it is the most logical explanation (if there isn't any other team behind the scenes offering more money I don't know what the hell samardzic agents try to accomplish)Where are the West Ham rumors? I've literally seen none of those. Some very vague mentions of them. Someone like Di Marzio would know by now if that's a real thing.
That’s because your not thinking about the complications this as a consequence will result in for years to come.Well let’s see how this saga ends up, but I am gonna blame the management if the deal collapses because we are unwilling to improve the contract by a mere 0.5mil. Sure, it’s a dick move from the player and/or agents/entourage what ever, but if we end up losing a talent on otherwise great deal (between Udinese) due to club principles, then fuck the management.
After all we were close to spending 70-80mil€ (wages included) spread over 4-5 years for Lukaku, before the Belgian went full retard mode.
Just take a bow and give the kid 0.5mil more. If he’s requesting a better deal from 1.5 to something like 3.5-> then of course it’s a different matter.
yeah, just like this week people on here were complaining that no one gives any respect to Inter anymore. getting bent over by your 5th choice midfielder isnt going to improve that situation.That’s because your not thinking about the complications this as a consequence will result in for years to come.
If the clubs give in, it will not just look increasingly weak. The cause of that action will in fact have long standing negative impact, where the consequences for it is you can never be sure a deal is a deal and that the other part will keep their end of the agreement, in all future player negotiations. Because you literally painted yourself up against the wall and accepted the premise that anything is negotiable up until the end, that the goal justifies the means, that anything goes, your asking that the club accept jungle law.
Where is all this coming from? What 0.5M?Well let’s see how this saga ends up, but I am gonna blame the management if the deal collapses because we are unwilling to improve the contract by a mere 0.5mil. Sure, it’s a dick move from the player and/or agents/entourage what ever, but if we end up losing a talent on otherwise great deal (between Udinese) due to club principles, then fuck the management.
After all we were close to spending 70-80mil€ (wages included) spread over 4-5 years for Lukaku, before the Belgian went full retard mode.
Just take a bow and give the kid 0.5mil more. If he’s requesting a better deal from 1.5 to something like 3.5-> then of course it’s a different matter.
They club have already "gave in" and showed it's weakness when they sold EpicBrozo for five million less that it was previously arranged.That’s because your not thinking about the complications this as a consequence will result in for years to come.
If the clubs give in, it will not just look increasingly weak. The cause of that action will in fact have long standing negative impact, where the consequences for it is you can never be sure a deal is a deal and that the other part will keep their end of the agreement, in all future player negotiations. Because you literally painted yourself up against the wall and accepted the premise that anything is negotiable up until the end, that the goal justifies the means, that anything goes, your asking that the club accept jungle law.
As far as I'm aware, and I can't be aware really, we had an offer that was deemed sufficient by WH. The player simply chose to go with Atalanta for personal reasons, plus the added bonus of a slightly bigger salary and a guaranteed spot. I'm taking about mentality and personal choice here. Do you think Scamacca couldn't have simply refused the transfer to Atlanta, no matter the specifics of their dealings with other teams?This is nothing like Scamacca. With Scamacca we didn't have a deal with West Ham (we could have had if we just offered few more millions day earlier). Now we have everything set up for the deal. Agreements between clubs, agreement with both players moving. Except suddenly we don't have agreement with Samardzic side because they want to change some terms.
I can't see why they would backtrack here. I don't believe there is West Ham connection, any kind of serious one. EVEN IF there was, moving there would be a stupid for the kid. He just had a season at Italy, learning the way calcio is played there. Now he'd get to one of the best teams in the league, to learn from better players in the team, learn from their coach. What would he get at West Ham? Fucking Moyes who's probably getting fired during the season if he doesn't walk out by himself in the next weeks. He would end up in a mess tbh.
A complete different situation and subject. That is in no way related to player contracts.They club have already "gave in" and showed it's weakness when they sold EpicBrozo for five million less that it was previously arranged.
I would also ask for a raise if i got paid less than dumbfriesThis guy is going to be a problem. As soon as a another club comes knocking he will ask for a raise. I will end the negotiation right here. Fuck off.