The account bet

[I4E]

:chan: at this thread....

Yep.... :chan:

 

[Native]

close thread

 

[Pimpin]

damn the wall , is a wall literally.

 

[dynasty27]

:chan: at this thread....

Yep.... :chan:

You mean ? Or ? Or Jackie Yao.


Srsly this is blast from the past epic stuff. Reminiscence of the time when Anon used to tell stories about the projects and clans. U kno when Kato was involved or some hashish like that.

 

[sanka]

The only real life bet i've made was the 'bitches bet'.

I betted i'll score over 3,5 in my holidays.

2 was still a success.

 

[Pimpin]

The only real life bet i've made was the 'bitches bet'.

I betted i'll score over 3,5 in my holidays.

2 was still a success.

so if you dated a midget would that count as 0.5?

 

[sanka]

BJ count for 0.5. :notbad:

tbh

 

[Big Willy]

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

 

[vitomins]

Here is my statement:

First of all, I'm not trying to defend myself at all, but it's always good to see things from the whole point of view.

How this thing started off was actually be of my post below:



I never said the goal is legitimate. I wasn't convinced after I heard what the commentator said. The commentator mentioned the ball deflected against 2 players, hence I said 'defenders'.

But, I then got this reply:



and I replied:



This is probably where I could be wrong because I said 'it is not offside' while it is supposed to be something like 'it is not always offside' or 'it might not be offside'. However, if that sentence is totally wrong, the reply I got is also wrong because I think many of us have seen enough football matches to realise that a ball that deflects defenders in the offside play could be thought as a pass and the goal is given as a legitimate goal. It is very subjective about the amount of deflection, it really depends on the linesman. (That's the reason I wanted to see another replay). Therefore I'm not wrong with my statement.

Then I got a reply again:



and I replied:



I don't know if anything is wrong with this. I have seen a lot of late offside calls, but I never see 1 linesman raises his flag right at the time the ball is passed. The linesman must see the ball is passed, then see the players in the offside position if they play the ball or just stand off. So, I think I was not wrong again.

Apparently my post pissed off someone:



So, the bet is 'that being offside'. Does that mean the goal? if that means the goal, then what bet is being talked? I never said the goal is legitimate nor denied the goal is not offside. So, I just asked the guy to shut up.



But, someone is so horny in betting:



Just 1 point to note: I never said ok for the bet. I never understood what the purpose is. So, I just asked the guy to shut up again.



The guy isn't happy to find his desire to betting isn't fulfilled:



Then, I clearly stated:



I'll stand by my belief and my religion that I don't do betting in life. I'm pretty sure a lot of people would respect their belief more than anything. Betting is something I don't do and I don't see the point I have to do it against my belief, religion and The God, just because someone didn't get my point.

and the guy disrespected my view, my belief, my religion and my God.



This was the first time he called me 'a little bitch' (I'm pretty sure, snake missed this post). I ignored the guy because I thought it was a waste of time.

The guy came back after the game in another thread to insult me after making this thread:



That post was edited by snake. Snake removed 'little bitch' from that post. But, once again, I tried to ignore his insult and I just said:



Failed to recognised being ignored but felt pissed off he tried another attempt to insult:



I wasn't angry, but I just wanted to give a shot:



Insult (I called him a little gigolo) was removed by snake and I was given a 5 point infarction which I accepted. However, if I got infarctions for 1 insulting post, should not the guy get at least 2 x 5 point infarctions for calling me little bitch twice? Well, I was told the guy got 5 only, but I don't really care how much he really got.

That was all the conversation. I know it is not important for anyone to read but this is just to clarify.

I stand by my opinion. I wasn't wrong at any of my statements. I never said the goal was legitimate, I also never denied it was not offside. My point that a ball takes deflections could be thought as a pass by linesman wasn't clearly understood by reader. I never accepted any bets on respect of my belief. I don't feel I did anything wrong at all. Therefore, I don't know if this is worth a ban, just because someone could not understand my english/points. I will let admins and mods to decide.

If admins and mods decide to grant this one-sided wish just because 1 attention looking child opens a thread, then we might see coasterfreek opens threads and forces a one-sided bet then requests the other member to be banned. (I'm sorry coaster to having you as an example). However, if banning me is really such a pleasure and desperately needed by someone to continue his life that he would commit a suicide if it doesn't happen, then I'd gladly to take the bullet to save his life.

But, once again, my statement is I don't think I should be banned because I wasn't wrong at any point and I stand by my belief that I don't do bet and I didn't bet on anything today, also the bet is a one-self imagination which he even presumed my reply as 'yes' to his quest.

P.S: the guy requests a life-long ban for me. Snake probably needs to re-negotiate because 1 day ban for me might not save his life.

P.S.S: the guy has disrespected me since he made the betting imagination. What kind of more disrespectful way I should be afraid of? I don't really care. With or without the ban, the guy won't respect me or anyone. It's just his nature for not being a respectful man. Call me coward for not taking the bet, but I'm glad I'm being honest to myself and my God.

Thank you.

Sorry but this whole post is BS, Ed. You obviously do not have a grasp on the offsides rule. This post is proof of that:

http://forzainterforums.com/showthread.php?11025-Chievo-Inter-(26-Sep-12)&p=1009772&viewfull=1#post1009772


As soon as you argue an offside call with the defense of "a deflection", you are completely wrong. Deflections off an opponent have no bearing whatsoever in whether or not the player is offside.

If the player is offside when the pass is made, it does not matter if it takes 10 deflections before it reaches a teammate and it also does not matter what the teammates position is after those deflections...the ruling is made based on the players position at the time of the pass. In the above post, browha is completely right (as usual...aye browha?) and you are completely wrong.


PS. You both have been dealt infractions for insulting one another, so please move on. Ed, I would appreciate it if you would admit to being wrong in this situation and Wall, I would appreciate it if you could stop asking for him to banned.

 

[Ed.]

Sorry but this whole post is BS, Ed.

Are you trying to be Mr Wise Guy? the whole post is BS because you related that with my conversation with another member? That's what actually BS, vito. I'm sorry to say. It's obvious you failed to understand. This guy brought his bet out of nothing and my post explained the situation between me and him. The bet is never made clear about what, as it's only stated as 'that'. I also never involved in any sort of betting.

Since you brought up my conversation with Browha, I didn't even read his whole post. (I know you will not believe me, but it's up to you, I'm just being honest). I saw him posting, I replied 'You're also wrong', coz I know right or wrong he would be pissed with that troll. If you read the whole conversation with Browha, it was clear that I didn't care what he posted and I just trolled him with his 'I'm Mr Right Guy'. If I'm not mistaken, the next post he came up with a post from wikipedia, I only read the word wikipedia and I trolled him for taking it from wikipedia. I just played around with his 'I'm Mr Right Guy'. I didn't care about his posts. I rarely read browha's posts tbh. Therefore, it is a completely different case with the stupid bet I never involved.

I know the theory of offside, but theory is a theory. Theory is what's written on paper, in practice it's often different. I never said I based my statement from a theory from any sources. I never said my statement is the rule of football but it is often granted. Don't you see the difference?

This whole thing is a complete nonsense and unnecessary. This will be my last post in this thread. I stand by my statement.

 

[Devious]

WTF is going on here? Ok, Im bored, I`ll start reading now.

 

[sanka]

Theory and practice won't ever be apart when we talk about football matters.

You both disapointed me in a way.

One bitches about a bet like we have a man's deal in a fuckin internet discussion,this is so fake and the other obviously hasn't play even amauter football and is stubborn as fuck when he obviously fails.

So much ego here..

 

[Devious]

Ok I didnt read the long posts, I just read the small funny comments and thanked. awesome! :excitedeyes:

 

[Earth]

This thread

Mind=BLOWN

 

[Big Willy]

Theory and practice won't ever be apart when we talk about football matters.

You both disapointed me in a way.

One bitches about a bet like we have a man's deal in a fuckin internet discussion,this is so fake and the other obviously hasn't play even amauter football and is stubborn as fuck when he obviously fails.

So much ego here..

Get an avatar bro, I always think you're browha lol.

 

[Vibe]

This is some pathetic shit...Suck my dick both of you,you should be banned together so you can experience the outer world cause you are clearly spending too much time drinking from jizz puddles with a straw on this forum.Although that would probably be a waste of time,cause you two degenerates would probably sell your houses and buy new ones so you can get a new IP adress to return here as quickly as possible.

I hope my penis is offside in both of your assholes and there is no referee to wave the flag and make me stop.I am going to be Filippo Inzaghi of your ass cheeks.Bet your accounts on that.

 

[Fitzy]

This is some pathetic shit...Suck my dick both of you,you should be banned together so you can experience the outer world cause you are clearly spending too much time drinking from jizz puddles with a straw on this forum.Although that would probably be a waste of time,cause you two degenerates would probably sell your houses and buy new ones so you can get a new IP adress to return here as quickly as possible.

I hope my penis is offside in both of your assholes and there is no referee to wave the flag and make me stop.I am going to be Filippo Inzaghi of your ass cheeks.Bet your accounts on that.

 

[Native]

LOLOLOLOLOL! :trollol:

 

[sanka]

Get an avatar bro, I always think you're browha lol.

done.

though i'll return to my typical oneliner quote/protest/shoutout soon enough.back 2 basics.

 

[vitomins]

Are you trying to be Mr Wise Guy? the whole post is BS because you related that with my conversation with another member? That's what actually BS, vito. I'm sorry to say. It's obvious you failed to understand. This guy brought his bet out of nothing and my post explained the situation between me and him. The bet is never made clear about what, as it's only stated as 'that'. I also never involved in any sort of betting.

Since you brought up my conversation with Browha, I didn't even read his whole post. (I know you will not believe me, but it's up to you, I'm just being honest). I saw him posting, I replied 'You're also wrong', coz I know right or wrong he would be pissed with that troll. If you read the whole conversation with Browha, it was clear that I didn't care what he posted and I just trolled him with his 'I'm Mr Right Guy'. If I'm not mistaken, the next post he came up with a post from wikipedia, I only read the word wikipedia and I trolled him for taking it from wikipedia. I just played around with his 'I'm Mr Right Guy'. I didn't care about his posts. I rarely read browha's posts tbh. Therefore, it is a completely different case with the stupid bet I never involved.

I know the theory of offside, but theory is a theory. Theory is what's written on paper, in practice it's often different. I never said I based my statement from a theory from any sources. I never said my statement is the rule of football but it is often granted. Don't you see the difference?

This whole thing is a complete nonsense and unnecessary. This will be my last post in this thread. I stand by my statement.

Man you are stubborn...