Here is my statement:
First of all, I'm not trying to defend myself at all, but it's always good to see things from the whole point of view.
How this thing started off was actually be of my post below:
Pereira's goal might be offside. I have to see another replay because the commentator says it knocked off defenders before Pereira took it. Anyway, I totally disagree if you say it is a troll goal. Nagatomo pass was a good pass and the build up to that goal is a team play.
Credit when it's due.
I never said the goal is legitimate. I wasn't convinced after I heard what the commentator said. The commentator mentioned the ball deflected against 2 players, hence I said 'defenders'.
But, I then got this reply:
Doesn't really matter if it did. Clear offside goal.
and I replied:
If it knocked off defenders, it is not offside.
This is probably where I could be wrong because I said 'it is not offside' while it is supposed to be something like 'it is not always offside' or 'it might not be offside'. However, if that sentence is totally wrong, the reply I got is also wrong because I think many of us have seen enough football matches to realise that a ball that deflects defenders in the offside play could be thought as a pass and the goal is given as a legitimate goal. It is very subjective about the amount of deflection, it really depends on the linesman. (That's the reason I wanted to see another replay). Therefore I'm not wrong with my statement.
Then I got a reply again:
No, you are wrong. The flag goes up at the moment the ball is passed.
and I replied:
101% the flag never goes up at the moment the ball is passed. So, you're wrong.
I don't know if anything is wrong with this. I have seen a lot of late offside calls, but I never see 1 linesman raises his flag right at the time the ball is passed. The linesman must see the ball is passed, then see the players in the offside position if they play the ball or just stand off. So, I think I was not wrong again.
Apparently my post pissed off someone:
Lol, I'm willing to do an account bet about that being offside. Whoever loses can't post on this forums anymore. It was a textbook offside.
So, the bet is 'that being offside'. Does that mean the goal? if that means the goal, then what bet is being talked? I never said the goal is legitimate nor denied the goal is not offside. So, I just asked the guy to shut up.
You can now stop posting then.
But, someone is so horny in betting:
We have a bet then? I give you this half to say bye bye to everyone around here because you are done posting if we have a bet.
Just 1 point to note: I never said ok for the bet. I never understood what the purpose is. So, I just asked the guy to shut up again.
I give you now to leave. not even 1 sec.
The guy isn't happy to find his desire to betting isn't fulfilled:
We'll see about that later.
I'm pretty convinced you'll avoid the bet like a little bitch but I may be wrong.
Then, I clearly stated:
I don't avoid, but betting is not legal in my religion.
I'll stand by my belief and my religion that I don't do betting in life. I'm pretty sure a lot of people would respect their belief more than anything. Betting is something I don't do and I don't see the point I have to do it against my belief, religion and The God, just because someone didn't get my point.
and the guy disrespected my view, my belief, my religion and my God.
You are already backtracking like a little bitch?
This was the first time he called me 'a little bitch' (I'm pretty sure, snake missed this post). I ignored the guy because I thought it was a waste of time.
The guy came back after the game in another thread to insult me after making this thread:
Why are you still posting?
That post was edited by snake. Snake removed 'little bitch' from that post. But, once again, I tried to ignore his insult and I just said:
Failed to recognised being ignored but felt pissed off he tried another attempt to insult:
Ah, it's not like I didn't predict this. It's not hard to smell a pussy, even over the internet.
I wasn't angry, but I just wanted to give a shot:
When you bought this forum, you can let me know. I'll go.
Insult removed.
Insult (I called him a little gigolo) was removed by snake and I was given a 5 point infarction which I accepted. However, if I got infarctions for 1 insulting post, should not the guy get at least 2 x 5 point infarctions for calling me little bitch twice? Well, I was told the guy got 5 only, but I don't really care how much he really got.
That was all the conversation. I know it is not important for anyone to read but this is just to clarify.
I stand by my opinion. I wasn't wrong at any of my statements. I never said the goal was legitimate, I also never denied it was not offside. My point that a ball takes deflections could be thought as a pass by linesman wasn't clearly understood by reader. I never accepted any bets on respect of my belief. I don't feel I did anything wrong at all. Therefore, I don't know if this is worth a ban, just because someone could not understand my english/points. I will let admins and mods to decide.
If admins and mods decide to grant this one-sided wish just because 1 attention looking child opens a thread, then we might see coasterfreek opens threads and forces a one-sided bet then requests the other member to be banned. (I'm sorry coaster to having you as an example). However, if banning me is really such a pleasure and desperately needed by someone to continue his life that he would commit a suicide if it doesn't happen, then I'd gladly to take the bullet to save his life.
But, once again, my statement is I don't think I should be banned because I wasn't wrong at any point and I stand by my belief that I don't do bet and I didn't bet on anything today, also the bet is a one-self imagination which he even presumed my reply as 'yes' to his quest.
P.S: the guy requests a life-long ban for me. Snake probably needs to re-negotiate because 1 day ban for me might not save his life.
P.S.S: the guy has disrespected me since he made the betting imagination. What kind of more disrespectful way I should be afraid of? I don't really care. With or without the ban, the guy won't respect me or anyone. It's just his nature for not being a respectful man. Call me coward for not taking the bet, but I'm glad I'm being honest to myself and my God.
Thank you.