This Malcom guy screams flash in the pan, it's the same nonsense with Gabigol.
Oh look half of Europe is after him, Omg let's get him then he becomes a punch line in jokes on bad transfers.
http://www.squawka.com/comparison-m...es/chances_created/assists/goals_scored#total
after gabigol im not trusting these young brazilians anymore. spalletti will bench him for the whole season and start candycross every game.
as of such my preference goes to lozano who seems to be, more productive. stronger mentally, scores also quite easy and alot.
Yeah proven Eredivisie stats. Just like our boy Luc Castaignos, il nuovo Ibra.
huh, castaignos was an unproven youngster. lozano is one of the league best players. i know you like to hear or see yourself talk but half of it is bs though. lozano could make the same impact suarez made. when he went for only 15m and right after he set the PL on fire.
Never seen him play tbh
Sent from my BLA-L29 using Tapatalk
What, Chiesa is garbage? I would take him over Malcolm everyday considering all due related factors.
Chiesa is definitely less risky option of the two
I agree. Even the one we are seeing as "kid" Karamoh had 5 goals and 4 assists at a very weak (relegation battle) side at League 1. If Malcom 50m vs Chiesa 60m and we have to choose one, the latter is a no brainer.If we can spend this kind of money, I would prefer Chiesa over Malcom. The main reason is Serie A adjustability. I hear Dalbert was the LB of the season at Ligue 1 last season, he couldn't even get above Santon in the pecking order. Malcom is a very talented attacker who scores more goals than Cheisa, but Chiesa understands Italian tactics and game, is more versatile and has a better overall game.
Chiesa is definitely less risky option of the two, assuming their price points are similar.