A purchase this season will have no impact on needing 60M plusvalenza.Idk man 14m is expensive if we really need a +60m
Why is that? Are we looking for a +60m net spending or a 60m plusvalenza?A purchase this season will have no impact on needing 60M plusvalenza.
Plusvalenza is not impacted by the purchase of players. Net spending is. Net spending is significantly easier to achieve than plusvalenza, which is why everyone is freaking out.Why is that? Are we looking for a +60m net spending or a 60m plusvalenza?
To be more precise, making plusvalenza for this current fiscal year is just to sell during this June. Whatever acquisitions we do, they go for next fiscal year (even if it's technically done in June already) and only for the annual amortization cost of value, not the whole transfer fee.Plusvalenza is not impacted by the purchase of players. Net spending is. Net spending is significantly easier to achieve than plusvalenza, which is why everyone is freaking out.
But why we need plusvalenza this fiscal year provided we sold Lukaku for 115 mln last August, which should be counted to this year?To be more precise, making plusvalenza for this current fiscal year is just to sell during this June. Whatever acquisitions we do, they go for next fiscal year (even if it's technically done in June already) and only for the annual amortization cost of value, not the whole transfer fee.
Because we are that broke.But why we need plusvalenza this fiscal year provided we sold Lukaku for 115 mln last August, which should be counted to this year?
He is a player Ausilio has been tracking since empoli primavera days. He isn't just someone we took because we could.Don't think anybody was super impressed by this dude, nor is he played long enough on a high level to make any serious judgments about his qualities. He is just a player we COULD get under favorable conditions, and we needed vice brozo. Hopefully it works out somehow...
Only because Asllani is under 21.So we can still do these two year loans?