- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
- Messages
- 13,036
- Likes
- 26,255
paying over 28M for Scamacca is retarded anyway... They can have him.
Seriously, our pathetic haggling over 1-2M screws us every year.
paying over 28M for Scamacca is retarded anyway... They can have him.
Seriously, our pathetic haggling over 1-2M screws us every year.
finally a good news, forza atalanta!
Strongly disagree, as you know.paying over 28M for Scamacca is retarded anyway... They can have him.
reopen the Morata thread.Strongly disagree, as you know.
More like Zapata thread, now that's he's unlocked via Scamaccareopen the Morata thread.
or beto... for me both are accetable for good price, as long we dont take scammacareopen the Morata thread.
You could also ask why no bigger club than Inter is interested in him then.If Scamacca is so bad as some people here describe him, why Roma and Atalanta also want to spend nearly 30mln for him?
i'd be worried if it were Milan and Juve... I dont care what those two loser clubs do.If Scamacca is so bad as some people here describe him, why Roma and Atalanta also want to spend nearly 30mln for him?
And probably a starting spot as well, which we can't promise.Biasin said they are also offering a better pay to Scamacca.
I don't care for Roma in particular but Atalanta usually are after good players. But, the fact is that both of the clubs are ready to spend 30mln for a player coming from a bad season instead to focus on other targets. Milan are not interested, because if they get him for 30mln they cannot sell him later with huge profit, as he failed already at EPL, so the options abroad will be very limited.i'd be worried if it were Milan and Juve... I dont care what those two loser clubs do.
atalanta is spending this much just cause of the sale of Hojlund and Mourinho has been crying for an attacker for 2 years.... Anyway, Scamacca will also have more playing time in Atalanta and he can actually be solid in that attacking system, while here he won't be a guaranteed starter. And spending 30M for a bench player is pretty stupid.I don't for Roma particular but Atalanta usually are after good players. But, the fact is that both of the clubs are ready to spend 30mln for a player coming from a bad season instead to focus on other targets. Milan are not interested, because if they get him for 30mln they cannot sell him later with huge profit, as he failed already at EPL.
I won't be surprised if Jube try to get him, but they need to get rid of Vlahovic first, which won't be so easy task.
and roma actually target a new name instead of SCAMacca. Marcos Leonardo, forward, from Brazil, Santos FC.atalanta is spending this much just cause of the sale of Hojlund and Mourinho has been crying for an attacker for 2 years.... Anyway, Scamacca will also have more playing time in Atalanta and he can actually be solid in that attacking system, while here he won't be a guaranteed starter. And spending 30M for a bench player is pretty stupid.
Yes but I can get mad at West Ham and Atalanta. Fuck those guys!Yeah I can’t get mad at inter for not increasing their offer. Scamacca makes sense at a certain price but not over 30mil euro considering the year he just had.