Do you have any clue how much noise there is on a stadium, you can easily make an insult to someone without other is able to hear it, especially if they aren’t paying much attention, which they likely won’t as so much shit is said among players.
No he isn’t innocent, that isn’t the verdict. You like all the rest don’t know what was said, Acerbi admitted that he said something, and no one can back up what he said either, no one can even back up something was said. So we are back at that it is words against words, this is really the only thing we can say… you can then choose what you believe was said, but that is belief not fact.
So no it ain’t disproven that Acerbi said something discriminating, just that it cannot be backed by other evidence.
The situation is largely unchanged, it’s fundamentally the worst possible outcome, because it falls on not enough evidence, meaning it’s up to everyone to make their own judgment, this will cling to him for a long time.
Even the Judge believed more in JJ from all I read so far….