Its not clear right now but I dont think so. 7m net for 3 years gives you 21m net euros. In the UK with bonuses he would have been about 25m net for the next 2 years so like 27m net euros. He's given up maybe 6m and extended his playing career a year. That's assuming no payout from united
In the UK with bonuses he would have been about 25m net for the next 2 years
Isn't it ~45m for the next 2 years?
Its probably a meet in the middle, tbh. Sanchez gets 21m from Inter, 3-5m from United, United write down his book value and save 45m in wages next two years. Everyone wins.
UK salaries are reported pre-tax unlike Italy, in the UK Sanchez makes £500k/week, so about £25mil a year (pre-tax). Tax is, near enough, 45% for Sanchez, so cut it in half.
Who have you liked more at Barca.. Sanchez or David Villa?
I have a friend (and brehme) who claims that Man U is paying him something. We'll see how things turn out.
I have a friend (and brehme) who claims that Man U is paying him something. We'll see how things turn out.
Its not clear right now but I dont think so. 7m net for 3 years gives you 21m net euros. In the UK with bonuses he would have been about 25m net for the next 2 years so like 27m net euros. He's given up maybe 6m and extended his playing career a year. That's assuming no payout from united
If we loan Nainggolan until his contract runs out would you see it a "win" for us too?Yeah you can think it that way too, but in terms of just thinking the current situation and not the whole case Sanchez at United, it's a win for them too. They got away with having to pay 50m€ in two years time to a player they can't basically use because he was useless for them. They needed to pay severance pay and take capital loss but avoided that enormous salary payment.