- Joined
- Jul 8, 2004
- Messages
- 3,513
- Likes
- 5
10 years of FIF
Handoyo said:Actually...I would still put Ruud ahead of Makaay. Ruud has better skills with the ball and can also play better moving to the flanks. Inside the box he is just as good or even better than Makaay. Plus he also plays fine when left all alone.
I agree. At one point, Ruud was overrated by the English media (we all know that there isn't a medium with that, you are either the flavor of the month or no longer a world class player). He may not have been healthy the past two seasons, but there is no denying that at his very best, he did exactly what he was asked to do which is putting the ball in the back of the net.
One has to look at the current formation that Manchester United is using right now, with Rooney and Ji Sung Park playing either in the wings or deeper roles to appreciate what Van Nistelrooy can bring to the team. Not only does he have enough skill on the ball, but as a pure CF, he's gifted enough to buy enough time to attract extra defenders and create space for others. I really love this part of his game, and why think it's rather foolish to even compare him to the likes of Roy Maakay.
In order of preference, the best (current) strikers in the world IMO.
1. Thiery Henry
2. Andriy Shevchenko
3. Adriano
4. Ruud Van Nistelrooy
5. Gilardino