Tell me please, If we hired Inzaghi instead of Conte in 2019, would Inzaghi outperform him? Would he be able to convince a coach like Pintus to join his team? Would a player like Bastoni start over Godin, or Barella over Radja? Please describe what Inzaghi could have achieved with the team he inherited from Spalletii with all its problems. Cause your comparison is not fair.Never understand why members defend Conte. He barely achieved the minimum during his tenure. Actually, Conte didn’t qualify past the group stages in CL in both years, which means he underachieved.
Inzaghi, in his first year with Inter, and 73% of of Conte’s first team, overachieved compared to Conte, considering he lost the MVP player.
Same can apply on what would Conte achieve if he came here instead Limonade year ago, and taking team without Hakimi, Eriksen and Lukaku? Dont see him beating rube twice and winning Coppa and Supercoppa..Tell me please, If we hired Inzaghi instead of Conte in 2019, would Inzaghi outperform him? Would he be able to convince a coach like Pintus to join his team? Would a player like Bastoni start over Godin, or Barella over Radja? Please describe what Inzaghi could have achieved with the team he inherited from Spalletii with all its problems. Cause your comparison is not fair.
This is not the point. The point is that Conte came to the club and the management bent over for him to the point where the primavera had to implement his 3-5-2 system. He got his way from transfers to system and barely delivered.Tell me please, If we hired Inzaghi instead of Conte in 2019, would Inzaghi outperform him? Would he be able to convince a coach like Pintus to join his team? Would a player like Bastoni start over Godin, or Barella over Radja? Please describe what Inzaghi could have achieved with the team he inherited from Spalletii with all its problems. Cause your comparison is not fair.
Him going through the CL group is also doubtful, but I think he would have won the scudetto.Same can apply on what would Conte achieve if he came here instead Limonade year ago, and taking team without Hakimi, Eriksen and Lukaku? Dont see him beating rube twice and winning Coppa and Supercoppa..
What do you mean this is not the point. You literally said Inzaghi is better than Conte. Explain please why so?This is not the point. The point is that Conte came to the club and the management bent over for him to the point where the primavera had to implement his 3-5-2 system. He got his way from transfers to system and barely delivered.
A club should not let a manager, whose tenure was not more than 3 years, dictate transfer and other dealings that may impact the club long after he is gone.
No manager can guarantee results!What do you mean this is not the point. You literally said Inzaghi is better than Conte. Explain please why so?
And what is wrong with making the management bent over for him? If this is something that needs to be done in order to reach the goals then what is the problem? You wanted Conte to win the scudetto with a magic stick or what? Why doesn't Inzaghi do the same, why doesn't he be more audacious with his demands? I will answer you why. Because he can't guarantee the result. He is afraid of getting held accountable.
A coach who guarantees the result sells a striker who everyone thought was a world class player for 60m and buys the one everyone thought was going to flop. A coach who guarantees the result sets up a special training and nutrition to make him the best striker of serie A.
What about Inzaghi? Eh meh.. Lukaku is not in shape, he is not the Lukaku we know... I don't know what to do. I think I will play Dzeko.
Inzaghi overachieved my ass... are you kidding me.
The only failure of conte is not having better results in cl. Saying he barely delivered is a proper bullshit. Comfortably winning scuddetto after ten years, playing el final year before that, always having a sense that team is improving and players are vigilant.This is not the point. The point is that Conte came to the club and the management bent over for him to the point where the primavera had to implement his 3-5-2 system. He got his way from transfers to system and barely delivered.
A club should not let a manager, whose tenure was not more than 3 years, dictate transfer and other dealings that may impact the club long after he is gone.
Why did you bring up this as if it justifies what you have said initially? So what that Rose managed doing eventually? Did he beat Inter? No. He can send his scouts all he wants, but the truth is he got his ass whooped. Cappelo is an old retard, I don't care about his provocative questions. He managed to flop in CL with galacticos and finishing forth in laliga. Where was his plan B?No manager can guarantee results!
Conte’s master plan
Conte brought in Lukaku for a very specific role, which actually was his main game plan. In fact, if you can recall, I believe it was Monchengladbach’s manager Marco Rose who asked his technical staff to study Inter’s game plans ahead of the first fixture and they produced only one video. When he asked how else do Inter play, his staff mentioned that Inter only have one game plan, which is boot it to Lukaku.
Again look back to the Sky sport Italia after show where Capello asks Conte after they failed to win against Donetsk of Inter has a plan B.
This is why you bring in a manager, so you can defend with 11 men and boot the ball to Lukaku?
So to answer your loaded questions, prefer Inzaghi over Conte in terms of football and Club planning. Spare me your fellating of Conte’s one dimensional football and constant nagging.