- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Messages
- 1,998
- Likes
- 1
- Favorite Player
- LUIS FIGO
Possible interesting developments fOr VDV.
http://media.egotastic.com/media/pictures/0908/jessica-stroup-nipple-01.jpg
Dumbass. I'm at fucking work.
Possible interesting developments fOr VDV.
http://media.egotastic.com/media/pictures/0908/jessica-stroup-nipple-01.jpg
Well, i would be happy with Sneijder+Cassano or Sneijder+VDV.
VDV is a good player, but he isnt what we need. He will become another Stankovic at Inter.
So you're going to choose who we buy based on 45 mins of football?
Needless to say, he was not "poor". He was fairly average, made a couple of good passes to Robben and got in a good position to be through on goal, but VP overhit what was a simple pass. Of course he got the goal aswell, though it was an easy tap in.
Sneijder has not been any better.
I've watched VDV a good long while. Hasn't progressed as he ought to have had. I can count the number of times touched the ball on one hand. England were in control of the match by the time Sneijder came on. His distribution was certainly better and he was more involved than VDV. VDV was too slow and weak in the challenge. Atleast he made the effort to track back. But his off the ball movement was poor. Nor did he intiate any attacking moves.
Sneijder has been (any) better.
Basing on todays performance, I would pay 3x more for Sneijder. I know somebody here only looks at "nice passes and stuff", but there are other things in football, besides goals and such
Sneijder is the better version of Stankovic(good at deffensive stage, and a lot better in offensive), Van Der Vaart is not.