- Joined
- May 22, 2004
- Messages
- 9,592
- Likes
- 2,515
- Favorite Player
- Oba
10 years of FIF
Thats what i ve been saying for some times in terms of total costs (yearly cost) we re not getting a striker of icardis calibre for cheaper. We might save 1 or 2 mios per year if we take a gamble on piatek but is that worth it? Consider that piatek after 1 or 2 good seasons would also want that salary bump.Interesting topic from trf section
A. Raise Icardi salary
0 fee + (7-9m wages x 2 tax x 5 year) = 70-90m or 14-18m/year
B. Replace with Top Striker (Auba, Higuain, Cavani, etc)
70m fee + (9m wages x 2 tax x 5 year) = 160m or 32m/year
C. Replace with good striker (Immobile, Bellotti, etc)
60m fee + (5m wages x 2 tax x5 year) = 110m or 22m/year
D. Gambling on promising striker (Piatek etc)
50m fee + (3m wages x 2 tax x 5 year) = 80m or 16m/year
E. Going madness not buying anyone (Gabigol, Pina, Lautaro etc)
Using all money to buy our loanee and raise Candreva and borja salary.
Pick your fighter and dont act cowardly...
And yes we re gonna make a huge profit on icardi but thats one time the cost increase from getting a good replacement in cavani higuain etc is permanent plus if we get an old striker which imho is the only way to get a striker on icardis level we re most likely not gonna be able to resell him 3 to 4 years down the road.
For all these reasons i would much rather see us bump his salary than getting rid of him. Also we should not forget that Mauro s value is not gonna drop drastically even if he has a shit season he ll still be worth a lot of money cause he has already 5 great seasons behind him. If we get a piatek or any other young guy for say 50 mio if he does not perform in his first season we ll most likely have another gabig/J mario on our hands which is the last thing we need.