- Joined
- Dec 21, 2015
- Messages
- 20,849
- Likes
- 32,809
- Favorite Player
- Wesley Sneijder
Best Football Poster
Best Overall Poster
It's not bias at all. The big differences between Thuram and Correa are age and potential. Thuram is 3 years younger and has room for improvement. On the other hand, Correa has more or less reached his peak. Flair and dribbling is great but in the end it won't mean much if he shits his pants in front of the goal. Right now we're lacking a scorer more than a creator.This is just plain biasness. Thuram has the same number of goals last 2 seasons (18 goals in 60, versus Correa's 17 in 58). The only positive Thuram has over Correa is his sellability in case he flops, but given how much we suck at selling this isn't a positive to me. We're sorely lacking flair/dribblers in the squad, someone who can beat his man and create moments of panic by drawing a few defenders out of position. 20M plus bonuses is a worthy investment. Lolito can fuck off otherwise. I agree Correa is not a suitable replacement for Kaku, but nor is Thuram.
I'd take Correa for 20m but in here we're talking about 35m. Correa is certainly not worth it.