- Joined
- Jul 3, 2018
- Messages
- 5,738
- Likes
- 8,152
- Favorite Player
- CARLOS
Not this shit again.
It’s the opposite. Inter is more popular domestically but Milan have a bigger global following. Or at least that’s the general perception.I always hear that Inter has less Italian fan but more international fan than Milan. But based on annual attendance it seems at least we have more dedicated fans.
I would hardly call Milan an Italian city anymoreI always hear that Inter has less Italian fan but more international fan than Milan. But based on annual attendance it seems at least we have more dedicated fans.
Fear mongering. One example: that monstrous yield looks like a bargain today. Inter is sick but it's far from the only sick club in Europe. Plenty of Spanish and English teams are in similar or worse situations.
Fear mongering. One example: that monstrous yield looks like a bargain today. Inter is sick but it's far from the only sick club in Europe. Plenty of Spanish and English teams are in similar or worse situations.
Get are rich owner, swallow that Northern Italian pride. We look like beggars out there.
Cool. You just described 99% of football clubs in Europe.Inter has only survive so far because of goodwill, because the company is a major sports team in a major sport, and those is a household name. A household name the league and European football cannot afford too lose. Had Inter been any other company it would have been put to rest long time ago.
I don't agree. There's significant net equity in the club. Future revenue forecasts are also pretty solid if one is willing to reduce our cost basis a bit. Milan are profitable for example.Inter has only survive so far because of goodwill, because the company is a major sports team in a major sport, and those is a household name. A household name the league and European football cannot afford too lose. Had Inter been any other company it would have been put to rest long time ago.
no we are not.are we really on the verge of bankruptcy
This.....no we are not.
Saying inter would've gone bankrupt if not for selling X Y Z player is silly.
ah fuck that headlines is just silly, its hard to put an equivalent example, but a company is not "bankrupt" if it can sell 2 non core assets and replace them, with no impact in performance (revenue). And its not the only variable (we wouldn't have added salaries if it were not for those going out).
Also if not for Onana and Brozovic, we have at least 3 more valuable assets (Lautaro, Barella, Bastoni) that if we ever sold we'd pay coupon and face value of the loan.
And lastly, what is bankruptcy for them? How do they know we would fail to pay coupon? Yap all they want, but we have a stable amount of $ coming our way from CHL and more cashflow in future with this Club World Cup, and a commercial situation that can only get better. For fucks sake we have basically been surviving without a sponsor.