Mancini isn't a very good tactician? based on what? the changes he makes? well allow me to remind you that almost everytime when we're losing a game, Mancini does make changes that win us the game. Do I have to mention few examples? I don't think that I need to. Sure he makes some mistakes, but remember that doesn't have the experience that Capello and Lippi have.
Spalletti is better than Mancini? are you serious? :|
Tell me honestly, what exactly did Spalletti achieve and Mancini hadn't?
Do you remember the Italian Supercup last season? Roma were leading 3-0. Spalletti "the magician" lost from Mancini 3-4 in that game.
Mancini owned Spalletti in the first game against Roma in Serie A (1-0). We dominated the game in our second Serie clash, they won by luck and thats all. The 6-2 defeat was totally the players' fault. And again, we owned them in the return leg, where they (and Totti) did nothing but getting help from the referee.
Alright, let's say that the players made that great season, not Mancini, then who do you think built this team?
Who do you think brought the players? who asked for Chivu? who asked for Suazo?
Who built our great team? Who knew what kind of players the team needs, and asked to sign them in the past seasons?
Was it Moratti? Branca? Oriali? I don't think so.
Zanetti, Toldo, Cordoba, Materazzi, Cruz, Adriano etc. They were all here before Mancini came, and guess what, they won NOTHING without Mancini.
