GDS & CDS Official Ratings

[Frisko]

Updated, Matrix and Dejan got robbed IMO.

 

[Frisko]

Etoo?

Sorry, forgot him, added him now, he'll come up when I post next time.

 

[Pajo]

Deki, Matrix and Eto'o deserve more... Milito deserves less... Others are fine by me..

 

[Besnik]

What the fuck!?

Eto'o deserves more than Pandev, I would give 7 to him..

btw, thanks Frisko for your contributions!! :thumbsup:

 

[cdj_dj]

What the fuck!?

Eto'o deserves more than Pandev, I would give 7 to him..

btw, thanks Frisko for your contributions!! :thumbsup:

what have Eto done whoole match?????

 

[Michael]

Inter - CSKA Moscow (March 31, 2010)

Julio Cesar: 6
First half was peaceful. In the second half, the Russians were more insidious and he had to intervene a couple of times. Valuable save on the shot by Aldonin. Decisive low stop on Necid.

Maicon: 6.5
The mission is the same, a right-back crosses and pumps the ball for the strikers. People in his path were tough, at first it was Mamaev and then Schennikov, but he was not impressed and therefore he advanced.

Materazzi: 6
In tandem with Samuel to take care of the lone striker in Necid. He was warned for a dangerous tackle. He was crucial in the air to stop a guy like Aleksei Berezutski. Reliability.

Samuel: 6
CSKA couldn't go deep with him there. Necid never received playable ball and was too alone. Samuel, along with Materazzi, kept the area clean in front of Julio Cesar. We expected to see him more dangerous up front, but he was in active.

Zanetti: 6.5
Very focused on Krasic. Mou said that because of the characteristics and dynamics of the Serbian that he applied with dedication. A little big apprehensive at first, but for a long period of time, the captain took measures to Krasic.

Stankovic: 6.5
Making Honda stressed out, and it is likely that Mourinho made him the head of the Japanese. In the second half, however, he was more decisive. It took muscles and experience to deal with these Russians. Too bad, he blew a chance when face to face with Akinfeev.

Cambiasso: 6.5
The usual stuff, like cut and paste. When the team needs something, the bald Argentine appears. He was also seen shooting the ball and sometimes he acted as the surrogate of Sneijder.

Pandev: 6.5
He is not the type of striker who wants to do the dirty work. Pandev has talent and he wants to exploit it in front of goal. Was close to a goal, but a defender saved it on the line. Akinveed also said no after. Unlucky.

Sneijder: 6.5
CSKA consider him and Milito as the most dangerous Inter players. Slutsky ordered two men in the midfield not to lose sight of Sneijder, but after an hour here came the usual assist. Too bad, wrong finish for the goal shortly after.

Eto'o: 6.5
For a limited of time he was on the right but then he moved to the left. But he was productive to crush the defense of CKSA. The fact is that the players of CKSA closed to him very quickly so the goal from Eto'o didn't come.

Mariga: NA
The only change of the game for Mourinho. Mariga was given a few seconds until the end.

Milito: 8
If it wasn't for him, Inter would bash their heads to the wall of CSKA. Defending the ball like few others. Was perfect for his side. Shooting with the precision of a surgeon. Today, few are stronger striker than CSKA. None, perhaps.

Mourinho: 6.5
Weren't good nor brilliant in the first half when there was physiological attachment because the attack of Inter was not composed. Didn't concede a goal at home to CSKA, which has always scored away goals.

Overall: 6.5
For a long time, they beat on the wall of CSKA. But then we think of Milito.

.

I'm disgusted. :wallbang:

 

[Luka]

What is wrong with Gazzetta ?

Yesterday, since 60th minute, CSKA didn't exist, while we had 15 shots on goal.

Where the fuck is that period in those ratings ? Ok, strikers missed those chances they had, but who really did ? Sneijder, Pandev and Dejan. As for the rest it was either good intervention of deffenders, or Akinfieev.

Where the fuck are those 30 minutes in those ratings ? How is it possible, that Stankovic and Cambiasso who did amazing job in this period of time gets 6.5 ????

What a joke.

 

[n4l]

.

I'm disgusted. :wallbang:

that is pretty ridiculous

what have Eto done whoole match?????

eto'o worked for the team in defense and attack

on the other hand, pandev was greedy (2 shots from 35 yards? come on) and wasted the chances gifted to him

pandev should've got a 5.5; he dribbled too much yet didn't dribble past anybody, created no offensive plays, wasted great chances, and didn't help much on defense

as i said in his thread, if his name was a certain mario (or SuperMoron), he would be crucified for the ridiculously lousy decisions he made...

 

[Ehsan]

I guess they watched the first half and then switch the Arsenal Barca? Because that second half was one of our best showings this year and easily deserved 7's and 8's to every player. We had like 9 shots on target which is more than off target shots in regular games... do these guys base performance on goals scored??

 

[Michael]

I guess for them an average first half and the inability to score more goals is worth a 6.5.

Just like strikers can lose rating points if they wasted any clear-cut chances. So I assume the same thing applies to the team.

 

[CafeCordoba]

Well, half the game is played in the first half. I don't think the ratings should be based on the magnificent second half if the first half is utter crap.

 

[KARDAS]

on the other hand, pandev was greedy (2 shots from 35 yards? come on) and wasted the chances gifted to him

pandev should've got a 5.5; he dribbled too much yet didn't dribble past anybody, created no offensive plays, wasted great chances, and didn't help much on defense







?!?!?!?!?! WHAT?!?! Pandev was constant tread to the russians ! Did you really watch the game dude?!?!? Pandev had very good game,unfortunatelly he didn`t score but he played very well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXFJVim989A (watch the highlights)

 

[Frisko]

Updated.

 

[Pajo]

Overall I agree with the ratings except 1-2 players.. And today, I COMPLETELY agree with the ratings

 

[Frisko]

Updated. Look at men of the match for this CL campaign: 4 Lucio, 2 Sneijder, 1 Milito, 1 Cambiasso, 1 Stankovic, 1 Balotelli.
Out of 10, 7 MOTM are players bought this season - we've certainly come a long way from the early Moratti era.

 

[Raul Duke]

Interesting observation, also Cambiasso's MOM many would agree should have also gone to Sneijder. Thanks again Frisko (for the millionth time)

 

[Pajo]

I agree mostly, just think that our forwards are little bi overrated this match.. I would give all of them 5.5 at most..

 

[Michael]

CSKA - Inter (April 6, 2010)

Julio Cesar: 6.5
It's not that he was anxious against CSKA, but the two times when the team needed his hands, JC was there. Important saves oh Odiah at the end of the first half, and then on Gonzalez.

Maicon: 6
Mourinho has given clear orders: there is no need to push up like crazy. Why risking it right? And Maicon focused on the defense. He did much more than just a full-back. Obedient.

Lucio: 7
Not beautiful to behold. Indeed, but however very effective, almost ferocious. But in the semifinal, there won't be another Necid...

Samuel: 6.5
Lucio was the one that handled the most work but for Samuel it was all about the details. Less striking because of his normal movements. Similar results, massive concrete.

Zanetti: 6.5
Another game where he playing the full-back role.He had some trouble of dealing with Odiah but then he was rejected. Dragging and excelling in the long run.

Stankovic: 7
He was an diesel, he was playing with a little bit of pace and possession of the territory. When he was not controlling the midfield, he did one of this favorite things to do, outside shooting.

Cambiasso: 7
He changed constantly, sometimes he was on the same line with the other four defenders. Playing a little bit like De Rossi, he seemed free to go forward also. Interesting role, which maybe helpful in the semifinals.

Pandev: 6
Mourinho asked him to take on menial tasks. He ran. When he attacked, he gave us the impression of forcing shots and plays.

Eto'o: 6.5
A champion who agrees to sacrifice. He was coming back and forth to provide balance. Many teammates should follow suit. When Milito was out, he went forward in the area and nearly score.

Milito: 6
Okay, he failed on the two scoring chances, but he was the one that got Inter the free-kick that which led to the goal.

Chivu: 6
Half an hour for him to redo after the head injury. Another step forwards to reclaim full of himself.

Balotelli: 6
He played in the cup, another piece on his path of rehabilitation. Maybe he could do something more, but we must be lenient with those who seek to redeem themselves. Or not?

Sneijder: 8
The Dutch robot programmed to to everything at the highest levels. Sneijder saw the game in seconds before tearing through the wall. Assisting in high definition. Fifth successful free kicks of the season. Not only a curve doctor, but a specialist.

Muntari: NA

Mourinho: 7
He chose the strategy of rationality. He had his eyes on the accelerator: not to push the pedal to save gas and go further.

Overall: 6.5
The manifest of cynicism. Minimal effort, energy restored.

.

 

[Suneet]

Dutch Robot.

Thanks guys.

 

[Besnik]

Thanks IF!! :thumbsup:

Sneijder: 8
The Dutch robot programmed to to everything at the highest levels. Sneijder saw the game in seconds before tearing through the wall. Assisting in high definition. Fifth successful free kicks of the season. Not only a curve doctor, but a specialist.