He controls the flow and tempo of our game. When the team has the ball, where are we going (left/right) and how fast. Players like Vecino, Gagliardini or Brozovic cannot do this.
The problem is Valero is so slow these days that he becomes a liability in our midfield. No agility to receive a bad pass without losing it and can't press opponents at all. This player type is something we've lacked since Cambiasso and it's very unfortunate we didn't get Valero earlier.
You just have this image of Valero controlling the flow and tempo of the game in your head and you are convinced that's what he does.
Well, he doesn't!
How does he exactly control the tempo when most of the time when he receives the ball either he loses it or make a short sideways pass? How does that control the flow and tempo and how can't other players do that?
If what he does is so important how come Fiorentina don't seem to be missing him?
Last year at Fiorentina he had 1 goal and 9 assists. So far this season, no assists!
Correct me if I'm wrong but if he actually does control the flow and tempo of our game, shouldn't pretty much most of the balls from the defense go though him? Shouldn't he be the one who decides from which side we attack? How does he do that when most of the balls out from our defense end up being long balls to the wingers or be given to the fullbacks?
I tell you what Valero does. When we have the ball in the center of the field, the opponent is sitting deep and we are just passing the ball around in a circle waiting for a gap tp open up, that's what Valero does. He is just there to make these short 1-2 meters passes back and forth in the midfield before the ball ends up passed to the FBs or the wingers.
Either that or he ends up losing the ball. He rarely does anything else and I think any other midfielder can do that.
Ok, I think that explains that he can't control the flow of the game. So how about the tempo? What does controlling the tempo mean? The way I understand it is that he is able to speed up or slow down our game depending on the situation, correct? How does he do that when most of the time he either ends up making short 1-2s with the nearest player or loses the ball?
He doesn't control the tempo either.
It's pretty hard to provide 'proof' of the efficiency of a deep-lying playmaker as neither goals and assists or defensive tackles/interceptions are really his job, but for the first half of the season when you watched him in our midfield the skill with which he manipulated space and picked out intelligent passes to put our players in better positions was quite plain to see.
Obviously not comparing them in terms of absolute quality but there were seasons in which Paul Scholes would score very few goals for United, often only 1 or 2. I don't have key pass/assist data to hand but reckon they often weren't through the roof either. His place in the team was never in doubt, though, because he could totally dictate play and very rarely lose the ball, and a player who does that in your midfield is very valuable. BV for the first half of this season did exactly the same thing. He's faded recently, but so has much of the team.
I haven't watched Scholes a lot to comment but I think you mean a player like Modric, right? A guy with a pass before the assists, that's what you mean, correct?
Well, I disagree compeletely. To be a deeplying playmaker he needs to be able to distribute the ball, provide key passes, dictate the flow and tempo (as Cafe said above). But I don't see him doing any of that.
To give him credit, I think our first goal today was generated by him. I think he crossed the ball to Karamoh, then Karamoh to Brozovic and then Eder.
Ok, but how many times does he do this in a game? In contrast, how many times he ends up losing the ball? He loses the ball way more often and these long passes are once every blue moon. Even Miranda and Skriniar sometimes do that, doesn't mean they can be deeplying playmakers. One successful long ball a game doesn't justify him starting.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
He has one successful long ball per game but on the other hand he is slow, can't run, can't shoot, can't defend and loses the ball too often. He is just a liability in the middle and I don't understand how is he a starter!
If he is such a fantastic player, how come we had zero competition for signing him? Every other club out there failed to see his quality but us?
The only reason we were doing well at the beginning of the season was because Candreva and Perisic were doing well. I'm one of Candreva's biggest critics but if you go to his thread you'll see a post of me praising him. Because he was actually playing well, making runs and distributing the ball.
Our gameplan was basically recover the ball and pass it to Candreva or pass it to DDA so he can pass it to Candreva. Candreva crosses and either Icardi or Perisic end up scoring.
Valero had nothing to do with our gameplan. He was busy in the middle making short 1-2s.
I hope soon see him benched for Rafinha. Then you guys will know what you are missing.