Achraf Hakimi

[Jnr]

Hakimi is a small plusvalenza, we still own 30M€.

I dont want to know what will happen after him .

They brought a manager who is a Yes man, now Hakimi.

Fuck the chinese.

E. Cheapest solution for owners. DiMarco now @lb and Darmian taking over @rb.

We are on that route.

 

[Pravesh]

I am still hoping that this is not going to happen. Damn!!!!

 

[Il Drago]

Replace with Lazzari and lets keep it moving.

You should have posted the video from our game when Perisic made Lazzari invisible.

Lazzari is shit in defense. Defensive black hole. And even in attack we aren't talking about a world class talent. Just good.

Going from Hakimi to Lazzari would be a massive downgrade. MASSIVE.

 

[NimAraya]

Knowing Inter they probably sell Hakimi for 60m and sign Lazzari for 40m, and then spend that 20m on some shit player then loan him out after failing to impress.

 

[koba]

#Hakimistay #Zhangout

 

[wera]

Sorry Inter, you won't get another Hakimi for 40mil anytime soon.

 

[Il Drago]

Sorry Inter, you won't get another Hakimi for 40mil anytime soon.

It took us 10 years to get a Maicon replacement. We haven't found a Roberto Carlos replacement since he left in 1996. Hakimi is going to be a similar case. These guys are one of a kind. Generational talents. They simply can't be replaced.

 

[javier_zanetti <3]

I hope we done some scouting because i cant think about proper replacement that doesnt cost much. But, in 2006 we signed Maicon for no money and almost nobody knew who he was.

I dont think we should even think about selling Hakimi, but if its the only offer so maybe we have no choice. But for 60M? Hell no. Hakimi is one of the best in the world and PSG cant find anyone near that. 70M at least, not including bonuses.

 

[pazza moratti]

Yes it sucks, but we dont own Hakimi and we still owe that 30m witch we dont have. So Hakimi is like a loan player who we dont afford to acquire, but we can make small plusvalenza and save some money from wages.

 

[bubba zanetti]

This is stupidity all the way,why we hired coach who plays 3-5-2 to sell fkn Hakimi?!?!WTF is wrong with these people in club LOOL

 

[brehme1989]

We will witness Marotta masterclass.

 

[Matawil]

now we are never going to see a full meaza screaming hakimi's name

 

[.h.]

Hakimi wasnt that well integrated into the team. As people posted on here loads, no chemsitry between him and the MC (Barella) who should work closest with him, and little contribution from Eriksen either.

He was really good at the tail end of the season, but for some reason the chemistry was never really there. At least the team knew how to use Maicon when we had him, to devastating effect, whereas with Hakimi it was alwaays more of a struggle IMHO.

Obviously he's young nad would hopefully continue to integrate further

 

[Jnr]

Chemistry? He scored and assisted 17 goals. Fuck the chemistry. You can build that in the next years, Achraf is basically a youth player @21.

World's best RB,RWB. No ifs or buts.

 

[Il Drago]

Hakimi wasnt that well integrated into the team. As people posted on here loads, no chemsitry between him and the MC (Barella) who should work closest with him, and little contribution from Eriksen either.

He was really good at the tail end of the season, but for some reason the chemistry was never really there. At least the team knew how to use Maicon when we had him, to devastating effect, whereas with Hakimi it was alwaays more of a struggle IMHO.

Obviously he's young nad would hopefully continue to integrate further

Hakimi is only 22, he joined from another league and he needed time to adjust to Conte's system. He had his ups and downs. Despite all of that, he finished the season with 7 goals and 11 assists. He can only get better from now on.

Inzaghi is more attacking than Conte so Hakimi would probably flourish under him. And he's crucial for our gameplan. Without quality wingbacks 3-5-2 simply isn't going to work.

We have been talking about our urgent need to get a quality lwb for months and now we lose our only quality wingback. From a sporting point of view it makes absolutely no sense.

And it's not like it makes perfect sense from a financial point of view. We haven't received an offer that is too good to refuse. For Hakimi's level, his potential and the amount we spent on him only a year ago, the offer is just decent.

 

[.h.]

Hakimi scored or assisted every 156 minutes. Darmian scored or assisted every 195 (including playing a game as CB)

- - - Updated - - -

Hakimi is only 22, he joined from another league and he needed time to adjust to Conte's system. He had his ups and downs. Despite all of that, he finished the season with 7 goals and 11 assists. He can only get better from now on.

Inzaghi is more attacking than Conte so Hakimi would probably flourish under him. And he's crucial for our gameplan. Without quality wingbacks 3-5-2 simply isn't going to work.

We have been talking about our urgent need to get a quality lwb for months and now we lose our only quality wingback. From a sporting point of view it makes absolutely no sense.

And it's not like it makes perfect sense from a financial point of view. We haven't received an offer that is too good to refuse. For Hakimi's level, his potential and the amount we spent on him only a year ago, the offer is just decent.

From any point its simple. Given the intersection of players who are likely to have offers, and likely to raise enough money for us, who would you rather lose?
* Barella
* Bastoni
* Lautaro
* Hakimi
* Lukaku

Because, lets be honest, those 5 are probably the only players who are gonna get offers of 50-60mil or more. I dont think De Vrij is more than 40, and Skriniar might be 50 but I'm not sure yet if the demand is there from a big club to want to sign him (maybe United or Real, but Real have their own financial problems and need to offload players urgently first)


I'd rather keep any of those players over Hakimi, personally. Yes he's incredible, and yes, I'd MUCH rather have him at Inter than lose him, dont get me wrong, but not if it cost us Bastoni (future captain and I hope he retires here), Barella (same as Bastoni), either one of the two strikers who've scored 104 goals in 2 seasons for Inter.



(And thats assuming we even get any offers for them. I think realistically Lukaku is conditional on Contes future, or once Kane and Haaland's futures are resolved before he gets approached. Lautaro's suitors will perhaps be limited to Athletico/Real/Barca, and two of them are distracted by other issues right now. Bastoni could go to City but I desperately dont want to lose him, and I dont think anyone is making a serious effort to sign Barella atm either)

 

[Il Drago]

From any point its simple. Given the intersection of players who are likely to have offers, and likely to raise enough money for us, who would you rather lose?
* Barella
* Bastoni
* Lautaro
* Hakimi
* Lukaku

Because, lets be honest, those 5 are probably the only players who are gonna get offers of 50-60mil or more. I dont think De Vrij is more than 40, and Skriniar might be 50 but I'm not sure yet if the demand is there from a big club to want to sign him (maybe United or Real, but Real have their own financial problems and need to offload players urgently first)


I'd rather keep any of those players over Hakimi, personally. Yes he's incredible, and yes, I'd MUCH rather have him at Inter than lose him, dont get me wrong, but not if it cost us Bastoni (future captain and I hope he retires here), Barella (same as Bastoni), either one of the two strikers who've scored 104 goals in 2 seasons for Inter.



(And thats assuming we even get any offers for them. I think realistically Lukaku is conditional on Contes future, or once Kane and Haaland's futures are resolved before he gets approached. Lautaro's suitors will perhaps be limited to Athletico/Real/Barca, and two of them are distracted by other issues right now. Bastoni could go to City but I desperately dont want to lose him, and I dont think anyone is making a serious effort to sign Barella atm either)

I would certainly prefer losing Lukaku over Hakimi. Lukaku is 28, he will never look again as good as he did with Conte and many teams are looking for a striker in a very limited market. This is the time to sell him.

 

[.h.]

I would certainly prefer losing Lukaku over Hakimi. Lukaku is 28, he will never look again as good as he did with Conte and many teams are looking for a striker in a very limited market. This is the time to sell him.

But my point is I dont think there's any demand for him right now.

Anyone dropping 120m on a striker is gonna go for Kane first, then Haaland. After being neutral at best in the Premiership, it;s a risky and expensive manouver to sign him. Clubs that can afford him realistically are, what, City, United and Chelsea?

City probably gets Kane, and I'm not sure yet if Chelsea will splash that sort of cash on Lukaku. Maybe if they win the CL?


We can sit here and talk labout how we'd rather sell certain players all we want, but if no offers materialise, its irrelevant.


The other one would be if Conte does land at Real Madrid, but again, I think they'd rather go for Haaland.

 

[Il Drago]

But my point is I dont think there's any demand for him right now.

Anyone dropping 120m on a striker is gonna go for Kane first, then Haaland. After being neutral at best in the Premiership, it;s a risky and expensive manouver to sign him. Clubs that can afford him realistically are, what, City, United and Chelsea?

City probably gets Kane, and I'm not sure yet if Chelsea will splash that sort of cash on Lukaku. Maybe if they win the CL?


We can sit here and talk labout how we'd rather sell certain players all we want, but if no offers materialise, its irrelevant.


The other one would be if Conte does land at Real Madrid, but again, I think they'd rather go for Haaland.

But neither of Kane and Haaland is available for 120m. Levy has put a 150m pricetag for Kane. Abramovich has also been quoted saying he will never make deals with Levy. Haaland has a 150m release clause that becomes valid next season. Dortmund have no reason to sell him a year earlier for less. And the season haven't even finished. Chelsea and City have a CL final to play. At least wait a bit before rushing to accept the first decent offer you get.

 

[.h.]

Okay, so PSG move on, sign a new RWB, and then we've got no demand for any of our plaayers