so kovacic will get pushed forward to am, a position he is totally unproven in? man, how can you possibly know this?
great logic to, we have a player who excels in his position deep in midfield and you want to move him up where he will be much tighter marked and will have much less freedom to do anything.
and ofcourse, you claim to have seen kuzmanovic play for stuttgart. how conveniently, and he was probably twice as good back then right? bitch please
anyone would be an upgrade tbh, someone who knows the basics of defensive positioning for starters.
and mudingayi is ten times more effective in the role he plays. there is not even a contest. only reason people were against the mudingayi signing was because of his age. other then he never played a bad game for inter. each game he played he was decent.
you obviously are in no position to tell me how to rate players. your an amateur kid, go back to school. who is this anyway, browha junior? nerazzurrininja?
Well Kovacic will be pushed as an AM, because during his years in Dinamo Zagreb, he didn't play as a deep lying playmaker; rather he proved himself as an attacking holding midfielder, and in fact was lauded to have Messi-like qualities by the Croatian media for some time.
It is great logic, because unlike morons such as yourself, I know what position Kovacic exceled in, as an AM at Dinamo. He does well as a deep lying regista, but would undoubtedly be more effective as an attacking regista. Remember his run against Lazio? He got into an attacking position and then made a spectacular assist to Rocchi.
And to top it all off, you think that Mudingayi would be a more effective substitute than Kuzmanovic.
Kuzmanovic can actually pass the ball, move well without it, and has a decent shot, while Mudingayi has none of those aforementioned qualities, only some defensive prowess.
You say that Mudingayi excels in his own respective role, but we will have players that can fill in the CDM role if needed. My point is that we also need a substitute for the rest of the midfield, in the central and attacking areas of the pitch.
We need a substitute able to circulate the ball around the field, a metronome, with regista-like qualities. In this kind of role, regardless of the position, Kuzmanovic works quite well, considering his transfer fee and his wages. Even in the defensive midfield, if we have someone covering him like Nainggolan, it could work.
If say Kovacic gets injured, this could certainly happen:
Kuzmanovic Nainggolan
X
Or conversely, if our box to box in Nainggolan or Guarin gets injured:
Kovacic
Kuzmanovic Nainggolan
Where X would be a hard tackling midfielder.
Now
I'm not saying Kuzmanovic should be a starter, but he's good enough for the bench.
Maybe you don't understand the concept of a forum,
where people share different viewpoints, and readers consider what they read in their own opinion. I'm not telling you how to rate players.
I think that you're likely insecure about your own age that you're calling me a kid, that I should be back at school. But my words of advice to you are to face the reality where
rating players based on the positional need of a team, lack of alternatives, and also the strengths of a player demonstrated both at Inter and at other teams (Stuttgart, Fiorentina) is damn good logic.
And get your goddamn facts straight, because this isn't nerazzurrininja or Browha junior; look at the username, I am pencil pal for heaven's sakes.