I watched The Dark Knight Rises last night. I'm not a huge fan of the series, but I do admire Nolan's way of treating the original material that is essentially a comic. The Dark Knight was, to me, a very messy and uninteresting movie, carried solely by the menacing performance of Heath Ledger, who transferred the perhaps biggest antagonist from any comics and in turn created one of the most memorable characters in film history.
Batman Begins is the strongest movie of the two, I think. Bruce Wayne has the potential to become a very interesting character, and of the two films I really think this one shows it the best.
The first half of The Dark Knight Rises has the best material of the series. Tom Hardy is electrifying as Bane, once again we begin to engage ourselves more with the character Bruce Wayne, and we begin to question what his motivations for putting on the mask really are. Selina Kyle was not a particularly interesting character, but she brought a lot of cinematic gunpowder - something we've missed in the previous films.
Speaking of Bane, I was completely stunned by how well he was portrayed by Hardy and written by the Nolan's. The Joker was dangerous in his unpredictability and his spontaneous nature, and was only a threat to Batman because of this. Sure, he had certain plans and schemes, but I still say that he wasn't a great threat to Batman - alone in the fact that he does not want to kill him.
Bane is a threat - he is a huge threat. Physically, mentally and intellectually superior, Batman - let alone a crippled Bruce Wayne - could do nothing to stop him. The fight in the sewers between Bane and Batman really show this, and this was in my opinion the best scene of the entire trilogy. Well written, well filmed and well edited (something that can't be said of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight).
But then... it all goes bad. I was so annoyed by Bane's choice to harass Bruce Wayne, and postpone the destruction of Gotham, just so that he could 'torture his soul'. It is also somewhat unbelievable that a city of Gotham's size can be taken hostage by Bane, and being turned into some anarchistic dystopia where evil reigns under the excuse of fairness.
The whole return of the Batman was also annoying - as many have pointed out, how did he get from Africa to America without money, passport and other resources?
BUT THE WORST THING WAS THIS: Miranda Tate. She ruined it for me. So we find out, with 20 minutes to go, that, oh, by the way, it was Miranda Tate, who by the way happens to be the daughter of Ras al Ghul, who designed this giant scheme. Bane, you say? Muscle. He's solely a henchman. This was what I felt the movie said to me during that revelation scene (that was extremely poorly executed - the dialogue was way too expository and regardless of this, they still used flashbacks to underline what was going on..). Bane's death was so anticlimatic that I was frankly stunned - and the death of Talia cliché and horribly written.
Overall it was good entertainment. It was the only movie in the trilogy that really captured the 'darkness', and the first half of the film does this really well. But that nuclear-french revolution v2 plot really bothered me. Better than The Dark Knight, worse than Batman Begins. Overall not really a disappointment as such, but rather a less than enthusiasm provoking surprise.