Samir Handanovic

[northx57]

What the fuck are they doing? Are they trying to become a feeder club? Is that why they are selling all the world class players and trying to start a youth project?

 

[.h.]

again i remind everyone this does NOT MEAN 30 million to us.

We only own half of Handanovic, which cost us ~8m+half of faraoni

The minimum it will cost us to sign him outright is another 10m - assuming we have a clause. If we dont have a clause, then why would Udinese say yes to any offer we make them? They wouldnt. They'll take half of the offer, or 15million.

So 30 million becomes 20 million to us if we sign him outright, or 15 million to us if we dont.

The first case means a total of 12 million profit to Inter. The second case means a total of 7 million profit to Inter.


You tell me if you think that's worth it?

 

[qb4ever_2k]

again i remind everyone this does NOT MEAN 30 million to us.

We only own half of Handanovic, which cost us ~8m+half of faraoni

The minimum it will cost us to sign him outright is another 10m - assuming we have a clause. If we dont have a clause, then why would Udinese say yes to any offer we make them? They wouldnt. They'll take half of the offer, or 15million.

So 30 million becomes 20 million to us if we sign him outright, or 15 million to us if we dont.

The first case means a total of 12 million profit to Inter. The second case means a total of 7 million profit to Inter.


You tell me if you think that's worth it?

I believe the coownership thing is just an accounting trick. If not, there would be shitload of rumour about Inter trying to include more youngsters to the deal or Udinese asking ridiculous price for another half etc...

 

[.h.]

I believe the coownership thing is just an accounting trick. If not, there would be shitload of rumour about Inter trying to include more youngsters to the deal or Udinese asking ridiculous price for another half etc...

Oh it definitely is a trick, we did the same thing Juve did with Isla & Asamoah. e.g. we signed him outright, and then sold half of him back to Udinese.

The question, yet again, is how much it will cost to resolve the co-ownership.

There is no "book" gain for co-owning a player - e.g. you dont halve the amortization or anything. The gain is in only having to have paid half for him.

So what it WONT be, is we've paid 16m for Handanovic and then signed him on co-ownership with a clause that lets us sign him outright for 1 euro, for example.


Best case scenario - we have the right to resolve it for 8m in our favour.

Worst case scenario - we have no right to resolve it and have to negotiate with Udinese

 

[Uncommon]

NVM. Wrong topic.

 

[Wobblz]

I too don't think we would be so dumb to agree to co-own a 28 y-o player, especially a WC GK, whose starting spot is guaranteed with the greedy cunts Udinese are.

If the math browha provides it really doesn't make sense to even consider about such a deal. 12M and we have to give everything AND MORE for a proper replacement, Sigiru's price for example would be around 15M.

And seriously, do we need to consider selling our best player to strengthen the team?

 

[.h.]

Well...
it is what it is. and what it is, is co-ownership.

 

[JJM]

El Mundo Deportivo is saying first option to replace Valdes is a Spaniard.My guess it's Guaita from Valencia :work:

 

[Howl]

i'd only be happy with his sale if we got like 50mil blivious: and replaced him with someone like diego alves

otherwise fuck that, we're selling our best player who has kept us from even more humiliation all season long

 

[Bluenine]

again i remind everyone this does NOT MEAN 30 million to us.

We only own half of Handanovic, which cost us ~8m+half of faraoni

The minimum it will cost us to sign him outright is another 10m - assuming we have a clause. If we dont have a clause, then why would Udinese say yes to any offer we make them? They wouldnt. They'll take half of the offer, or 15million.

So 30 million becomes 20 million to us if we sign him outright, or 15 million to us if we dont.

The first case means a total of 12 million profit to Inter. The second case means a total of 7 million profit to Inter.


You tell me if you think that's worth it?

Browha, can I ask where are you getting these numbers from? From what I understand, we bought half of Handa for 6m+half of Faraoni, making Handanovic's valuation at 14-16m (12m cash plus Faraoni). There is no way to confirm this as the clubs do not disclose details, but I suspect that Inter have a agreement in place where we can give another 6m plus the other half of Faraoni to complete the transaction - Udinese gets into these co-ownership agreements only to help the buying club on the costs of acquisitions.

Assuming Faraoni is worth 2m, then if we sell handa for 30m, we make a profit of around 16-17m (taking intoo account a year of amortisation).

Is it worth it? I don't know. It depends on how highly we rate the likes of Bardi or Carizzo, and who do we get for that money... clearly, if we go after another top keeper, this move will be silly. But if, for example, our management really rates Bardi, and spends that money to get a quality striker like Benteke, then it may make some sense.

Personally, I would hate to see Handanovic go, he is our only world class player at the moment...

 

[.h.]

Browha, can I ask where are you getting these numbers from? From what I understand, we bought half of Handa for 6m+half of Faraoni, making Handanovic's valuation at 14-16m (12m cash plus Faraoni). There is no way to confirm this as the clubs do not disclose details, but I suspect that Inter have a agreement in place where we can give another 6m plus the other half of Faraoni to complete the transaction - Udinese gets into these co-ownership agreements only to help the buying club on the costs of acquisitions.

Assuming Faraoni is worth 2m, then if we sell handa for 30m, we make a profit of around 16-17m (taking intoo account a year of amortisation).

Is it worth it? I don't know. It depends on how highly we rate the likes of Bardi or Carizzo, and who do we get for that money... clearly, if we go after another top keeper, this move will be silly. But if, for example, our management really rates Bardi, and spends that money to get a quality striker like Benteke, then it may make some sense.

Personally, I would hate to see Handanovic go, he is our only world class player at the moment...

6m or 8m, either way, i think the argument is there. As you say, we dont actually know, so lets just roll with that number for now.

I also suspect that, but yet, we have no evidence of it at the moment. Infact, there's no historic evidence of Udinese doing this, its only really this season as far as I'm aware where they have done these deals.

 

[Hasan]

C'mon browha you're smarter than this. We have brougth him for 12 milions and that is it. Udine can take money for other half ONLY from us. Branca can't be that stupid not to do deal without clause.

 

[.h.]

Yeah you assume that.... all historic evidence points to branca being more stupid than we credit him for.

 

[Zerothe]

http://calcio.fanpage.it/handanovich-al-barca-per-sanchez-bartra-e-montoya/

 

[Michael]

Barcelona are ready to offer a two-year contract to Pepe Reina and thus the idea of Samir Handanovic is now fading away. Inter are safe.

 

[Solfice]

Thank god!

 

[wera]

Yes! We continue to have no money!

 

[SlumDog]

Barcelona are ready to offer a two-year contract to Pepe Reina and thus the idea of Samir Handanovic is now fading away. Inter are safe.

:excitedeyes:

 

[Sokrates]

Barcelona are ready to offer a two-year contract to Pepe Reina and thus the idea of Samir Handanovic is now fading away. Inter are safe.

Let's hope that doesn't mean that our genius mercato team will sell Handa for 12 millions to Liverpool :work:

 

[Earth]

Let's hope that doesn't mean that our genius mercato team will sell Handa for 12 millions to Liverpool :work:

rehashed joke is rehashed