GDS & CDS Official Ratings

[Frisko]

Your idea is great, Frisko!!!!!!
Thanx in advance!!!
but could you make this tables more readable ( to use a less size for letters, or bigger cells )??

Everybody else have problems reading them? They look ok to me but I can try to change them if you all have probs.

 

[Forza ragazzi]

That was just an example Forza Ragazzi, to let you see what it'll look like.

I'll update the tables on 30 August when the calendar comes out.

That hit me the minute I posted the post. I just didn't wish to bother editing it.

It seems fine to me. Might be something with chinga's computer's coding.

 

[chingashow]

it's ok now
but in some time all cells will be filled and the letters will be unreadable, more space around letters will be needed. anyway the idea is great and won't lose it's greatness

 

[Waleed]

Superb idea Frisko, lmuch like the other translatory work you do for us, this will only improve the quality of the forums.

 

[Frisko]

Updated the CL table in the first post.

Italian Supercup, should I include that? If yes, in which table? Or should I just post the ratings?

 

[alvaro]

Inter-Roma, these are mine:

8.0 Figo
7.5 Vieira
7.0 Stankovic,Zanetti,Crespo
6.5 Maicon,Cambiasso,Ibrahimovic
6.0 Samuel,Adriano,Grosso,Toldo,Dacourt
5.5 Materazzi

 

[Waleed]

Updated the CL table in the first post.

Italian Supercup, should I include that? If yes, in which table? Or should I just post the ratings?

Posting the ratings for the Supercup seperately rather than including it in one of the above tables would be the best idea IMO.

 

[Frisko]

Supercoppa ratings:



In detail,

BEST PLAYER = LUIS FIGO - 8: Soul, brain and lungs of the team, it's fair that he was the one who scored the decisive goal. Every dangerous move starts from his foot. Immense talent, never gave up, he was the source of play behind the strikers.

WORST PLAYER = ADRIANO - 4: he's shaking his head when he comes off the pitch, but during the 60 minutes he played, he did nothing. His only shot, from a free kick, goes off target. The "Adriano problem" is more and more worrying, it's like playing with 10 men.

I agree with the ratings, apart from Vieira, he should have been a 7.5 if you ask me.

 

[Lamb of God]

i think our management is really doing great in the transfer market getting players like figo and vieira regardless of his age.real madrid is clearly missing figo with beckham not his usual form.im really worried about adriano hes getting worse and worse after every game but im still a big fan of him.ibra was good to assist crespo and its to early to judge ibra because he himself says that hes not 100 percent fit but if he is im sure he will take on defenders on his own.

 

[alvaro]

What the ****? Zanetti and Stankovic 5.5? They were both great at second half, and not poor like 5.5 in first half. Also Zlatan 5.0? no no....

 

[Ziyad]

I agree that Zanetti and Stan should get a 6 due to their runs in the second half and onwards but if you notice they are not generous with their ratings so i would say fair..

Mancio needs to address Adriano and help him to get out of this mental and physical rut.Otherwise with everygame he will get worse taking it on himself and spiraling as a result.

 

[Adam]

What the ****? Zanetti and Stankovic 5.5? They were both great at second half, and not poor like 5.5 in first half. Also Zlatan 5.0? no no....

Zlatan getting a five is an insult. So he missed two very good chances. Sure, that's bad but he also created a lot of chances for his teammates. Earned fouls and won many air-duels. He ran a lot and rushed Romas defense which enabled him or other Inter players to steal the ball at numerous times.

La stampas 6,5 is a much more fair rating. Either way it doesn't really matter, the fans at Inter.it gave Zlatan a good rating and that's what is most important.

 

[Frisko]

Zlatan getting a five is an insult. So he missed two very good chances. Sure, that's bad but he also created a lot of chances for his teammates. Earned fouls and won many air-duels. He ran a lot and rushed Romas defense which enabled him or other Inter players to steal the ball at numerous times.

La stampas 6,5 is a much more fair rating. Either way it doesn't really matter, the fans at Inter.it gave Zlatan a good rating and that's what is most important.

Erm, fans ratings important? Reality check please.

Also, Zlatan missed a great chance, a sitter, plus made several mistakes. He surely didn't deserve more than he's got.

 

[Gaetan]

Zlatan getting a five is an insult. So he missed two very good chances. Sure, that's bad but he also created a lot of chances for his teammates. Earned fouls and won many air-duels. He ran a lot and rushed Romas defense which enabled him or other Inter players to steal the ball at numerous times.

La stampas 6,5 is a much more fair rating. Either way it doesn't really matter, the fans at Inter.it gave Zlatan a good rating and that's what is most important.

Zlatan was easily one of our best players out there, Gazzetta is without a shadow of a doubt wrong in giving him a 5 for this match IMO.

Although missing a sitter isn't sexy, he did assist Vieira's second goal, create set piece opportunities (several) and win air duels. From a debut performance, what more can you ask for?

 

[Adam]

I care more about what the fans think then what Gazzetta dello sport think, so there's no need for a reality check.

And also did you watch the match? Saying he deserved a five for missing a great chance or two is undermining everything else he did in the match, which was a lot. That five is an insult because even though he ****ed up he was still one of the most productive players.

 

[Frisko]

By the way Gaetan, I'm sure you noticed that his 'assist' for Vieira's equalizer was actually a miskick.

 

[Gaetan]

By the way Gaetan, I'm sure you noticed that his 'assist' for Vieira's equalizer was actually a miskick.

His intentions were to rebound what was put in by Crespo and it was a miskick, leading to an assist. What's done is done, and it was an assist. Amantino Mancini's goal was a complete mistake, but what does it go down as? Roma's first goal.

Zlatan did much more out there then we've seen a striker do for us in terms of building up play, slick touches and providing a link from the midfield to the penalty box then we've seen in a very long time.

 

[Adam]

His intentions were to rebound what was put in by Crespo and it was a miskick, leading to an assist. What's done is done, and it was an assist. Amantino Mancini's goal was a complete mistake, but what does it go down as? Roma's first goal.

Zlatan did much more out there then we've seen a striker do for us in terms of building up play, slick touches and providing a link from the midfield to the penalty box then we've seen in a very long time.

I agree, good post man.

Anyway, he can and will do much better then this.


Peace. I'm out for now.

 

[Frisko]

I wish more people would post their opinion about this, cause if you ask me, you've seen some other game last night...

 

[Stefan]

Ratings are fine except for the Zanetti,Stankovic and Ibra ratings. They deserve more. Ibra had a good debut as far as I am concerned should have taken some of his chances but else than that he did all that was expected. Had a role in 3 of our goals. Won the fk that led to figo supplying Viera with the first goal,assited viera for his second goal and won the fk that led to the winning goal.