2019/2020 Forwards Rumours Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Lukaku had agreed to move to Juventus. Man United had agreed terms with Juventus over the price. Man United didn't live up to their end ("convincing" Dybala). So the deal didn't go through, and that's when Marotta returned with his 80m offer when he was lowballing Man Utd with 60 and 65m deals, numbers that are celebrated as the actual deal now which is untrue.

At the same time Inter was out of the race since Inter did not manage to reach an agreement with Man United. We made a bid for Cavani when Juventus and Man United agreed on their deal.

I don't see how something so simple is so hard to digest!

Even Lukaku said he was "very close" to Juventus and you'd see from his expression that he also was certain that he'd end up there.

- - - Updated - - -

How was it done if one of the parties didn't agree? It's considered done only when all the parties are in agreement. I agree we didn't fool Woodward about Lukaku. In the end we paid more or less what he initially wanted. The only thing we managed to negotiate was the payment structure.

The payment structure was always irrelevant. It's the final detail. It's the equivalent of "will you be paying cash or by card?" that the sales person tells you after you've arranged to make the purchase.

Making this a selling point for Lukaku was Conte's defensive mechanism on why we overpaid and delayed so much in our mercato with his "priority". If anything, it's disrespectful towards Lukaku that this is tossed around as if it's not common practice.

Our initial offers were always going to include instalments.
I don't think we've given a full payment on an 8 digit transfer since the early 2000s.
 

Bluenine

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
13,322
Likes
5,377
Favorite Player
Zanetti
10 years of FIF
Transfer Guru
It was like brehme explained. Deal of Lukaku to Juve was done, but it didn't go through because Dybala didn't accept United's contract terms. It would have been a swap but 1 out of 4 parties (United, Juve, Lukaku, Dybala) didn't agree.

It's not reasonable to twist the events to anyone's favour to support any agenda. We got Lukaku, we are happy he's scoring goals but it wasn't even close to "fooling Woodward" like suggested.

I didn't say anything about "fooling Woodward", thats an older argument by someone else. I am just tired of this constant narrative by Brehme, you know the "Marotta is shit, Conte is shit, Icardi is a God" agenda.

The Lukaku transfer was a complicated one. It was clear that Juve were very motivated to get him, as were Inter. There was a lot going around in the background, many rumours and speculations: I remember reading an interview with Dybala's agent where he claimed that Juve and Man Utd couldn't find agreement; English press had reports that the deal fell through coz of the agent's demands; there were rumours that Marotta convinced Dybala that Inter would be a better option than Man Utd if Juve force him to move; and then there are reports that Dybala himself never wanted to leave. Its hard to say what actually happened, and Brehme like always is spinning it to suit his agenda.

The only thing for sure is that both Juve and Inter wanted Lukaku, and Inter got him. Thats the factual part of it, without spin. In my opinion we overpaid, but as I explained that is understandable. That part is opinion.

It was the same when Brehme was trying to paint the Eriksen transfer as a failure of Marotta. Thats the kind of bullshit narrative I am trying to argue against. Sure, Marotta dragged on that transfer for a few frustrating weeks due to his penny pinching habits, but the fact is that we got a player of Eriksen's profile for 20m. You cannot spin that as a negative just to suit your bullshit agenda.

I won't even start with the whole Icardi bullshit, hopefully we are rid of that unprofessional turd forever.
 
Last edited:

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
I didn't say anything about "fooling Woodward", thats an older argument by someone else. I am just arguing against the constant narrative by Brehme, you know the "Marotta is shit, Conte is shit, Icardi is a God" agenda.

The Lukaku transfer was a complicated saga. It was clear that Juve were very motivated to get him, as were Inter. There was a lot going around in the background, many many rumours and speculations: I remember reading an interview with Dybala's agent where he claimed that Juve and Man Utd couldn't find agreement; English press had reports that the deal fell through coz of the agent's demands; there were rumours that Marotta convinced Dybala that Inter would be a better option than Man Utd if Juve force him to move; and then there are reports that Dybala himself never wanted to leave. Its hard to say what actually happened, and Brehme like always is spinning it to suit his agenda.

The only thing for sure is that both Juve and Inter wanted Lukaku, and Inter got him. Thats the factual part of it, without spin. In my opinion we overpaid, but as I explained that is understandable. That part is opinion.

It was the same when Brehme was trying to paint the Eriksen transfer as a failure of Marotta. Thats the kind of bullshit narrative I am trying to argue against. Sure, Marotta dragged on that transfer for a few frustrating weeks due to his penny pinching habits, but the fact is that we got a player of Eriksen's profile for 20m. You cannot spin that as a negative just to suit your bullshit agenda.

I won't even start with the whole Icardi bullshit, hopefully we are rid of that unprofessional turd forever.

The only agenda I see here is you having a fundamental disagreement with me and twisting everything I say to suit your narrative.

I never said Marotta or Conte is shit. I said I don't want them at Inter.

Marotta because he's overrated (getting full credit for the recent Juventus dynasty by Inter fans is ridiculous and borderline schizophrenic) and I disagree with his management style, which is an old head that is ultra conservative, stubborn, wants to work only with specific people he can control and has no regard for loyalty but is just a cold accounting type that hasn't really produced much great results. The biggest coups of Juventus were not his doings, with the exception of Pirlo and he was mostly Agnelli's wish rather than Marotta's choice, but I'll allow it. Selling Pogba could be seen as a great deal, but he didn't want to go for Higuain and Pjanic, Agnelli did because he wanted to eliminate the competition. Marotta had other targets as I specifically mentioned earlier and it's ironic that they were Lukaku and Eriksen actually :lol:

As for Conte, I've been over this a lot. He's also very overrated because of his Juventus tainted "glory" and for pretty much being a stubborn fuck in the Euro. For some reason Euro 2012 where Italy was an unlikely finalist was a fluke, but Conte reaching the last 8 is some sort of miracle, despite having better talent available that he refused to use... He's not a crap coach, he's just not an elite one that we're paying him as if he were. And all he's shown us so far is that he's still a stubborn fuck and he managed to get eliminated from Europe which was the catalyst of Spalletti's tormented season in the 2nd half of last season. So it's nuts that we have all this support for this Juventus legend that is overpaid and hasn't shown that much, apart from a decent run in the league that doesn't differ that much from Mancini's or Spalletti's first season in the 2010s. Which pretty much = Handanovic saving our asses and sometimes we end up scoring more than the opposition. When Handanovic was out for like 3 weeks, everyone was trembling. There wasn't much confidence in this team.

As for Icardi, we went over that many times and this exaggeration of my view is getting ridiculous. Just because I don't want to crucify someone that the management has fucked over undeservedly because he retaliated doesn't mean I consider him a deity or a person without mistakes.

Now, to your agenda.

I said that Marotta was not a great negotiator and it's true. He has failed so far in every deal he got involved.
1) Lukaku: Wasted 2 months and almost lost the player to Juventus before agreeing to the initial terms.
2) Lazaro: Spent 25m on him for no clear reason.
3) Barella: Cagliari wanted 35m, he managed to give them 37m.
4) Eriksen: Tottenham wanted 20m, his deal was expiring and he was free to talk to anyone but we took the risk of negotiating the deal from 15m and didn't even consider paying up the 20m for fucking Eriksen, but we had no hesitation on pulling that sum and then some for freaking Lazaro! Yes, I'm not going to praise Marotta for that. Good job on Inter convincing Eriksen to come, but Marotta almost cost us the transfer. You can hail him as a genius all you want.
5) Victor Moses and Ashley Young. After Conte was upset that we couldn't bring his request in Vidal and was even more upset that we'd bring Eriksen who he didn't want, we sealed two unnecessary deals just because the coach ordered them. Victor Moses in particular makes little sense while Ashley Young is one of the most random transfers I've seen in a while at Inter. He's not doing bad, but that doesn't mean he's some great deal business, Man Utd was happy to offload him.



I do get that there's a reason why some of these deals may have been increased as it allows for more flexibility given that we extended the payment duration, but the thing is, we are crap at selling. This is why I was furious and exclaiming that we've committed 300m in one summer.

1) Icardi. We started the summer with an asking price of 80m, tried to hand him to Juventus for Dybala in order to absolve both of our FFP problems (why even think of doing that when all we want is for them to get in a weaker spot???) only to have both players reject this move. Barely managed to get a deal of 5+65 option. Of which, corona or not, we sealed the deal at 62m total. More than 10% discount, that's a number that makes several mothers run to clothing stores.
And the fun part is that Marotta was the person who managed to reduce Icardi's value from an 100m player to outcast.

2) Perisic. Still yet to see this, but we rejected a 5+25 option in January from Arsenal which coincidentally probably would have eliminated the need to throw Icardi under the bus, only to loan him the next summer on a free loan with the hope that Bayern will make history by signing another rare loanee. For a mere 20m.

3) Joao Mario. We rejected offers of 15m because it'd give us a capital loss only to loan him to a Russian team with an option of a figure they never spent before at 18m (their biggest transfer was at 12m iirc which with the current conversion probably falls to just a bit over 10m), which they'll probably send back to us or negotiate to 12m or so. Remains to be seen. But more on this on his lookalike's comment.

4) Nainggolan. Tried to ship him to China, even boarded him on a plane to Asia in the hope that he'll be convinced or whatever despite being blocked from the team, only to loan him on a funded loan to Cagliari. So we're paying Nainggolan to play against us...

5) Gabriel Barbosa. Flamengo kept bidding 18m all December long only for Marotta to say no, I want 20m. He offered him to Tottenham for Eriksen, they said maybe, Barbosa said no. We accepted an offer from West Ham at 20m, he also said no. We ended up selling him almost a month later to Flamengo (which means we paid his salary, which is funny in not the haha way) for the price of... 18m.

6) Miranda. We had offers to sell him but instead we terminated his contract, giving us a 3m capital loss and iirc we also compensated him for that. And he ended up at Suning's Chinese team... Maybe we can put the blame on Suning here, but still. If we want to give Marotta credit for everything, let's be consistent, right?

7) Borja Valero. We had offers from 500k to 2m, but we wanted 3m. His book value was 2.5m but we just couldn't sell him to free up a roster spot because we'd get a small capital hit..


Now please, give me reasons why I should embrace Marotta as some sort of super manager that I should be pleased to have around. We can continue this to the Marotta thread.
 

Candreva Crosses

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Feb 5, 2016
Messages
9,634
Likes
2,539
Favorite Player
Sheik Salman
Old username
EEeyOO
Brehme, I didn't read your whole post but I saw that you think Conte is overrated because of blabla in juventus. What do you think about Allegri?
 

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Brehme, I didn't read your whole post but I saw that you think Conte is overrated because of blabla in juventus. What do you think about Allegri?

He's more flexible, less stubborn and perhaps a better coach, but also not elite. Objectively I prefer Conte's mentality over Allegri but the character, obviously not so much.
 

Bluenine

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
13,322
Likes
5,377
Favorite Player
Zanetti
10 years of FIF
Transfer Guru
I said that Marotta was not a great negotiator and it's true. He has failed so far in every deal he got involved.
1) Lukaku: Wasted 2 months and almost lost the player to Juventus before agreeing to the initial terms.
2) Lazaro: Spent 25m on him for no clear reason.
3) Barella: Cagliari wanted 35m, he managed to give them 37m.
4) Eriksen: Tottenham wanted 20m, his deal was expiring and he was free to talk to anyone but we took the risk of negotiating the deal from 15m

This "failure list" is exactly why I feel you are just following your anti-Marotta bias. Marotta heads our sporting project, you have to look at end results of the deals when you judge him. You see 4 failures above, I see 3 successes and 1 failure. If we also add Sensi to this list of all 20m+ transfers under Marotta, its a very decent success rate on material transfers. I expected a lot from Marotta, so far he is delivering as per expectation.

You are a knowledgable poster, but I feel in the last 12 months or so you have let your anti-Marotta and pro-Icardi bias cloud your thinking.

"Barella: Cagliari wanted 35m, he managed to give them 37m"!! Come on dude!
 
Last edited:

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Again, you're missing the picture.

You are talking about something that has nothing to do with the initial comment you attacked me for. And you keep doing it.

The argument in discussion is whether Marotta is some great negotiation master that strikes great deals. I've repeatedly mentioned his deals as proof that he is not. And that in fact he tends to overpay and not get great returns for sales either. There really is nothing to support him here as all evidence points to what I'm saying. It's not an opinion, bias or anything. It's mere commentary on his actions thus far.

You can argue that Marotta identified those targets and that they were great additions. But that was never the discussion and you should leave me out of it as I hadn't commented on that.

The argument is that Marotta has not managed to pay a penny less than what was demanded from the selling club. Facts. He also delayed a lot, which matters in these things, only to fully oblige to the seller's demands in the end. And he even paid more. Even Lukaku has a resale % on top of a 80m valued deal for crying out loud!

If he makes a great deal you're going to hear it from me. Because I'll actually be surprised by that.
 

Bluenine

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Feb 3, 2009
Messages
13,322
Likes
5,377
Favorite Player
Zanetti
10 years of FIF
Transfer Guru
Brehme, you are possibly confusing my posts with someone else. I have been taking about Marotta being good at his job. So if you were saying that you think Marotta is a great director of sport despite not being convinced about his negotiation skills, we don't have an argument. But I suspect that is not what you are saying. Because this is what you wrote, and its not just about Marotta's negotiation skills:

Marotta because he's overrated (getting full credit for the recent Juventus dynasty by Inter fans is ridiculous and borderline schizophrenic) and I disagree with his management style, which is an old head that is ultra conservative, stubborn, wants to work only with specific people he can control and has no regard for loyalty but is just a cold accounting type that hasn't really produced much great results. The biggest coups of Juventus were not his doings....

Also, some of the things you state as "fact" are actually speculation / rumours / your opinion. Let me give examples from you last few posts:

The argument is that Marotta has not managed to pay a penny less than what was demanded from the selling club. Facts. He also delayed a lot, which matters in these things, only to fully oblige to the seller's demands in the end. And he even paid more. Even Lukaku has a resale % on top of a 80m valued deal for crying out loud!

None of those 4 statements in bold are a fact, just selective media speculation and your opinion

Once again, Lukaku was bought for 80m. That was the original asking price and it took us 2+ months to give in to Man Utd's demands. The deal is 65 + 10 and then there's 5m bonuses that are still not public information.

Not fact, speculation

So they genuinely did beat us to Lukaku but their deal collapsed. And how did we respond? We went to Manchester United, right after the last suitor for Lukaku had given up, and gave them exactly what they were asking for from the beginning.

Speculation

3) Barella: Cagliari wanted 35m, he managed to give them 37m.

Ridiculous speculation.

None of these are "facts".
 

Capo

Prima Squadra
Prima Squadra
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
870
Likes
542
SMH....

Icardi is a flog, I'm glad we have finally sold him.

Marotta has steadied the ship we call Pazza Inter. We're still challenging for the title, lets see how the season plays out by so far but for mine he has exceeded expectation.
 

Candreva Crosses

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Feb 5, 2016
Messages
9,634
Likes
2,539
Favorite Player
Sheik Salman
Old username
EEeyOO
Bluenine needs to learn that brehme is the fucking definition of fact.
 

varmin

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Dec 23, 2014
Messages
9,479
Likes
9,039
Forum Supporter
Most Improved Member
Brehme is great to make speculations of him as real facts.
 

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Also, some of the things you state as "fact" are actually speculation / rumours / your opinion. Let me give examples from you last few posts:



None of those 4 statements in bold are a fact, just selective media speculation and your opinion



Not fact, speculation



Speculation



Ridiculous speculation.

None of these are "facts".

No they are facts indeed.
What we have here is not speculation from one party but merely information asymmetry.
 

Il Drago

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Dec 21, 2015
Messages
20,849
Likes
32,814
Favorite Player
Wesley Sneijder
Best Football Poster
Best Overall Poster

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
Well, the same media claimed that Barella cost us 45-47m when the deal was done only to be corrected later on.

Cagliari had accepted bids from Napoli and Liverpool at a total value of 40m as well.

What we gave Cagliari is 12m + 25m + 4m in case we win an important trophy. 41m total valuation of the deal. Indirectly we also gave them Nainggolan on a paid loan, which furthers adds to our cost, if you wish to consider that. But they are separate deals and I doubt they were even discussed during this process.

Cagliari asking for 50m is just media tricks to get clubs make bidding wars and try to raise interest. Chelsea also got interested when they heard of that price tag, about a player that wasn't even on their radar.
The difference from Brescia doing this is that Barella had rejected Napoli and Liverpool and has also rejected talking to Roma (who had unsuccessful bids of around 30m).

As for Ashley Young, the coach may have liked to have him around, but the idea is that he wasn't a starter for them. Even the article says he left for playing time. For me that's quite alarming that this guy had assurances that he'd be a starter at Inter. Maybe happy to offload him is a bit too much, but it's not like they didn't get more than they could have imagined for him at that situation, which is what I was implying.
 

diamen

Capitano
Capitano
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
1,276
Likes
2,013
Favorite Player
Lord Darmian
You can complain on Marotta, but so far he was able to buy all of his primary targets. We get Lukaku and Barella in the summer and Eriksen in the winter. Now, our primary target is Tonali and I'm confident that his new destination will be Inter Milan.
He had two failures and they were caused by Paratici's strategy to mess with us, because Juve helped Roma with Pellegrini - Spina swap, so they blocked Dzeko transfer and Kulusevski was stole by Juventus. He could spend 20 mln euro for 33 years old Dzeko with expiring contact, but I'm glad that he refused to do this, because it would be a steal. Kulusevski on the other hand prefers Sarri's tactic, so I cannot blame anyone.

I have a feeling that with Ausilio we would get nice players, but one level below. So, we would fail with Lukaku and end up with Duvan Zapata, we would fail with Eriksen and end up with De Paul etc.

Besides, I think that a strategy to bring the best italian players available in the market is great. They won't rather complain and demand a transfer to Barcelona/Real Madrid in the future and we can build a solid backbone. Every new italian hot prospect will be then tempted to go to Inter, because there will be possibility to play together with his teammates from national team.
 

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
I'm not complaining. I'm just stating the fact that he has not managed to negotiate a price to a lower degree and he delays too long to complete the deals which could have been costly. We are lucky that it didn't cost us a player but it eventually will.

There is this idea that he's some kind of master negotiator which is far from the truth. That's the only argument I'm making here. Whether you think I'm biased against him or not is irrelevant when faced with these facts, and not speculation.
 

Capo

Prima Squadra
Prima Squadra
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
870
Likes
542
I'm not complaining. I'm just stating the fact that he has not managed to negotiate a price to a lower degree and he delays too long to complete the deals which could have been costly. We are lucky that it didn't cost us a player but it eventually will.

There is this idea that he's some kind of master negotiator which is far from the truth. That's the only argument I'm making here. Whether you think I'm biased against him or not is irrelevant when faced with these facts, and not speculation.

There is two ways to look at it.

He, Marotta can buy someone on the cheap and extract as much value as he can. Or, he can get the deal done and sign the right players to challenge for a title and bring this club to the top level it deserves.

If its to win titles and challenge consistently, I rather he just get the deal done if this means paying market rate, pay it. Otherwise Serie A will become a 1 league team and no one wants to see Juve win 20 Serie A titles in a row.
 

brehme1989

La Grande Inter
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
34,649
Likes
17,442
10 years of FIF
Nostradamus
Most Passionate Member
There is two ways to look at it.

He, Marotta can buy someone on the cheap and extract as much value as he can. Or, he can get the deal done and sign the right players to challenge for a title and bring this club to the top level it deserves.

If its to win titles and challenge consistently, I rather he just get the deal done if this means paying market rate, pay it. Otherwise Serie A will become a 1 league team and no one wants to see Juve win 20 Serie A titles in a row.

But the question here is not whether we are just paying the market rate.

We are dragging the negotiations for ages and ages only to just cede to the initial demands. It's amateurish.


I've done my share of transacations and I never paid the asking price if I spent more than two phone calls with someone for something I was interested in. I won't break his balls for months, lowballing the guy only to then pay up the amount he insisted upon. I'll look elsewhere because that's what I can afford to give.

But if I am certain that this is what I want and I have the funds the other party is seeking for, I'll pay the damn asking price if I see that after the 2nd meeting the other party doesn't seem to go any lower.

Well, Marotta takes several weeks and the difference between what I do and what Marotta does is that there's more supply in my industry and less interest in what I want while Marotta has to act quickly to avoid getting beaten by others. Something that had happened with the Lukaku case and he got lucky that Dybala said no, because that would have been a waste of 2 months of "negotiating" for nothing. At least he "negotiated" for 2 months and got the player at the initial asking price.


Imagine going to the supermarket and wanting to buy some milk. The carton costs $1. You say that you're only willing to pay $0.80. The cashier will just keep repeating: Sir, it's $1 for the carton. You keep insisting, waste everone's time and maybe someone will take that carton from you and go pay the damn $1. Or in Marotta's case, after breaking everyone's balls for not willing to pay the full $1, he proceeds to open his wallet and give $1 to the cashier. And some people are praising him for "negotiating" this...

This is pretty much the layman's example of Marotta's negotiation skills at Inter so far with the best examples being the transfers of Lukaku and Eriksen.
 

.h.

Part time Lazarus
La Grande Inter
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
29,319
Likes
7,419
Favorite Player
Inter1-0Wanda
Old username
browha
Forum Supporter
10 years of FIF
u just gotta ignore the deus ex brehme
 

Hasan

Allenatore
Allenatore
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
7,869
Likes
62
Favorite Player
4 & 10
10 years of FIF
I don't think payment in next 3-4-5 yrs is appreciated enough. Maybe Marotta sometimes pay the same/close price club is asking but he prolonged payments for years and he did made us competitive without spending crazy amount of money right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top