Recent content by InterFan

  1. I

    Calciopoli II

    Who said they're focusing on the Calciopoli? A club can't do multi-taskig? they don't have lawyers? Anyway, I hope Inter will prevail well from this matter.
  2. I

    Inter - Barcelona (20 Apr 10)

    That was not a penalty! Alves acted it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5hN6fcl5bk There was definitely an offside in the 3rd gaol. In real-time it was practicaly impossible to clearly judge over that offside.
  3. I

    Calciopoli II

    The fact that it's through private SIM cards and direct to referees and also the tone of the converstation makes it sounds much more controlling than Fachettis' chats, but I doubt there is something Moggi could be convicted on it.
  4. I

    Calciopoli II

    Hell no!! I definitely don't trust them. But I can trust them when they say pro-Inter stuffs :-) I know it pains them inside...
  5. I

    Calciopoli II

    I take back my "unreliable" statement. I just state I don't feel I can trust it. I hope to see such news more and more. However if we get out of it without any punishment only because of law of limitation, our image will still be damaged :(
  6. I

    Calciopoli II

    If I don't know the language and the magazine is by definition belongs to X(fans, officials, whatever) it doesn't mean it's biased, but it means that I'm personaly afraid to trust it, that's all. However, I searched for the word "colpevole" as represented in interfcnews citation and there is no...
  7. I

    Calciopoli II

    This is exactly the news I saw in Corriero. I didn't see any connection between it and what was appearantly reported in fcinternews, but that could be due to my bad Italian. I hope to see such news in English sources, though there is hardly such which is objective.
  8. I

    Calciopoli II

    Ok, let's say they're not reliable for me, as someone who doesn't know Italian thus haven't read from that source over the years.
  9. I

    Calciopoli II

    I understand! But I'm very weak in Italian, so I couldn't find anything like thar in Corriero, especially as it should be a headline news there. It doesn't appear in Corriero's 1st page of this morning, even though the new is dated to yesterday evening.
  10. I

    Calciopoli II

    fcinternews is not a reliable source by definition - it's Inters'. We need to see such news from other sources, including anti-Inter sources like Tuttosport, because if they make such news, it can only mean it's true.
  11. I

    Calciopoli II

    So I prefer to have the source from Corriero. I didn't see it in their site.
  12. I

    Calciopoli II

    fcinternews is not a reliable source. It's suppoed to be biased like El Romanista and Tuttosport, isn't it? Thefore I see no reason for your last comments.
  13. I

    Calciopoli II

    That doesn't answer why Juve's HQ were so rapid in getign rid of Moggi. They didn't ecen try to defend him or themselves. All Itly is waitig for Moggi to reveal something concrete tomorrow, not just "nice chats" which don't draw any punishments to no-one.
  14. I

    Fiorentina - Inter (10 Apr 10)

    It's hard to see Roma losing points in the easy games they have. Only against Lazio they have a small chance to lose 2 points but we have a match against Juve which is never easy because their motivation is allways sky high against us and they run a lot.
  15. I

    Sampdoria - Inter (Coppa Italia) (4 Mar 09)

    Hell I more believe in the possibility that by playing so awfully, if we play very badly against MU, it would look relatively Ok.
Top