Radja Nainggolan

at the moment I'd rather sell Brozo for 40 and keep Radja

inter never stops with these stupid decisions, this guy is class we should have kept him last year too. just imagine we had him instead of gaglia on the pitch specially in the EL. what the fuck man.

wera said:

at the moment I'd rather sell Brozo for 40 and keep Radja

Click to expand...

No one is paying 40M€ for Brozovic.

Only reason to sell nainggolan is if we can buy Kante or Partey.

I think we should stay as we are.

Nainggolan rotates the position with barella.
Vidal rotates with brozo
Eriksen rotates with sensi.

And I guess gagliardini fills in whenever some one is injured.

Same reason why we are trying to find buyer for Brozovic is why we will get rid of Radja. They are not reliable professionals.

Vidal did some stupid shit but always connected for breaks on international duty or something similar if I am not mistaken. Also, Radja and Vidal are totally different levels physically.

If Vidal is LeBron James then Radja is Carmelo Anthony, same age, both talented but ... not on same level any more.

Il Drago said:

According to Schira, Inter and Cagliari are working for the permanent transfer of Nainggolan. 3m loan with obligation to buy for 9m.

Click to expand...

No way this is true. His FFP value is more than this. Another Bs from Italian press.

I am afraid we're selling Nainggolan because we can't get rid of dumb (Vecino) and dumber (Gagliardini). If we kept him, we would have 8 players for 3 positions. Way too many.

:chan: 12m for Nainggolan is RETARDED!

NOBODY will offer 12m for Joao after this

wera said:

at the moment I'd rather sell Brozo for 40 and keep Radja

Click to expand...

please call Karl and ask him to send over that fax already.

I want to go through the amortization thing once more.

Nainggolan's case is this:
Book value: 19m€
Contract length: 2 years
=> annual amortized value is bookvalue/remaining so it is 9.5m€

If he stays in our books, thus we keep him or loan him, we need to cover 9.5m€ of his book value, the annual amortized value. Covering means we need to have 9.5m€ this fiscal year in the income statement, meaning we need to generate 9.5m€ revenue to have Nainggolan in our books.

The rumor goes he's going be loaned for 3m€. This means we would need to cover 6.5m€ this fiscal year to have Nainggolan play for Cagliari. Next year, they would be obligated to buy him for 9m€ while Radja's book value would be by then 9.5m€. This means we would register 500k€ capital loss (actually 800k€ since his value is like 19.3m€ or something in the books).

Then salary is completely another story and I'd say there's no way we can cover any of his salary (annual gross salary 8.3m€) this season or the next to make any sense of this deal if it happens with these numbers. With these numbers, we would make small saving this season in terms of total costs of the player, but also we wouldn't have the player in our usage obviously.

Generally these numbers seem very unimpressive for a player like Nainggolan and we look like a fucking supermarket for small clubs with these terms. Hopefully it will be something better.

Conte midfielder = 1. Vidal 2. Barella 3. Brozovic 4. Gagliardini 5. Sensi 6. Eriksen

Nainggolan doesn't have space at here. Conte already have 6 midfielders.

There is no way Conte dispose Gagliardini, same as Inter no chance dispose Eriksen.

At Cagliari Nainggolan will become their first midfielder, in here only seventh behind Eriksen. :alone:

magnesium said:

Conte midfielder = 1. Vidal 2. Barella 3. Brozovic 4. Gagliardini 5. Sensi 6. Eriksen

Click to expand...

No way is Gagliardini ahead of Sensi. When both were match fit, Sensi started over Gags on a regular basis.

Yeah but when is Sensi ever fit. Black Knight starring Martin Lawrence, great movie btw.

Universe said:

Yeah but when is Sensi ever fit. Black Knight starring Martin Lawrence, great movie btw.

Click to expand...

My Black Knight is a reference to my picture tho

Black Knight said:

My Black Knight is a reference to my picture tho

Click to expand...

'Tis but a scratch.

Glass box said:

'Tis but a scratch.

Click to expand...

Ok, so how do I thank a post?

via58 said:

Ok, so how do I thank a post?

Click to expand...

I think there was some rule like you have to post 100 times to use the thank button.

So Inter only signed him to get rid of Zaniolo? Very Inter-esque.

According to Centotrentuno.com, Nainggolan to Cagliari is close. It will be 10-12m€ with a formula of loan + obligation to buy.

Really unimpressive numbers if it happens with those figures. Though about my calculations above. I think that with loan + obligation/option, it can be also done so that we will get the fee after the season but before the fiscal year ends, meaning we book the fee to this year. That would mean that we would book between 7-9m€ capital losses this fiscal year. But would be mitigated by not having to pay him any salary anymore, but still. Basically end outcome would be we get nothing and won't have Radja in our team.

edit. Need to correct that in the case of Nainggolan staying, we need to have around 18m€ to cover his total annual cost. But if he goes with the parameters above, we don't need to have that money. We get nothing, but we also don't need to have anything (financially-wise).

Using Radja and be a competitive team

Gagliardini claims another victim.