I find the talk about selling Martinez unwarranted.
All of us knew that he is a second striker and is not capable of being the spearhead of our attack. I think expectations are too high and that posters on here are failing to take into consideration that the burden when it came to goalscoring was meant to be shared between Dzeko, Martinez and Correa. The question I have is why isn't Correa a part of the sale conversation?
Correa has not played and can not be relied on to make a contribution and yet we are talking about selling Martinez ahead of Correa who was a complete waste of money and will not amount to shit at Inter.
The other thought I have is why are the likes of Liverpool and Atletico Madrid supposedly interested in him? They are top European clubs and they know players when they go in for them. Personally, I feel too much is being asked of him and he is also trying to make up for Dzeko's stagnant play.
Lautaro plays as a second striker doesn't mean he is not expected to be the main scorer. He is our most valued and well-paid striker, but he is not great at creating (everybody knows that) and we can't expect him to score loads of goals either? Then what we can expect? A defensive striker?
We talk about selling Lautaro doesn't mean we want to keep Correa. Ideally we replace both of them with more effective strikers.
Atletico had a lot of failures in transfer recent years, Felix (too expensive), Diego Costa, Lemar, Griezmann, it's not like they are successful with all their signings. Liverpool is another story, they already have a great team with great attacking players, Lautaro can benefit from playing with Salah and co. just as every body here has said, he's a Robin not Batman, Liverpool can win with a striker that doesn't score regularly (like Firmino) because they already have Salah, Mane, Jota, etc. We don't have that luxury. Robin is useless without Batman and with our current financial situation, we can't buy a Batman for Lautaro, so we'd better sell him to buy a Batman.