Future Inter coach...?

[Frisko]

I think he did okay under the circumstances when he came to us, and he's the guy who discovered Mutu. But certainly I wouldn't want him back!

 

[Jimmy]

Lucescu did okay? He was absolutely horrific when he was with us. He struggled so bad, he even resigned before the season was over after getting us knocked out of the CL as well.

 

[Frisko]

I think he did okay under the circumstances when he came to us, and he's the guy who discovered Mutu. But certainly I wouldn't want him back!

 

[Jimmy]

And I disagree with it. Lucescu was horrible, regardless of the circumstances. Tactically clueless and had no idea of how to coach a team.

He falls into the same category as Tardelli. I'd say that Zac perhaps did okay (definitely not better than a mere okay) during the circumstances.

 

[Frisko]

I don't like Zac at all, he's very limited and I don't like how he plays but he's way, wayyyy better than Tardelli. Lucescu too. I mean anybody is wayyy better than Tardelli.

Tardelli managed such moronic moves, he couldn't even correct obvius mistakes with the whole of the S Siro shouting at him what to do. He also managed to phuck up Pirlo for us, even if he knew him better than anyone from the Under 21 National side.

You're free to think Lucescu was awful, I personally think we had much worse than him at Inter.

 

[Jimmy]

Had worse, yes, but it doesn't mean he didn't suck.

 

[J zanetti]

lol damn that.


theres always next year for me and ashkan

We can always dream, right?
Anyway the only time I could see him joining us is when Moratti is totally out of the picture. Reason being is that, as you perfectly know yourself Mourinho will not put up with anyone interfering with his job. At our club everyone unfortunately have a say, and hence the mess.
But as I said we can always dream….

 

[1919]

how do u guys feel bout an experienced Serie A coach like Prandelli or Mazzone ?

 

[Frisko]

I don't see that kind of guy leading us to the scudetto. The only alternatives to Mancini that would make me happy would be Hiddink or Eriksson.

 

[Handoyo]

I don't see that kind of guy leading us to the scudetto. The only alternatives to Mancini that would make me happy would be Hiddink or Eriksson.

:dazed:

Tell me you did not just say that, Frisk?

 

[shahz_nerazzurri]

I don't see that kind of guy leading us to the scudetto. The only alternatives to Mancini that would make me happy would be Hiddink or Eriksson.

Eriksson wont be a bad coach, he is doing the best he could with the overrated bunch of english players. And he has loads of serieA experience with Sampdoria and Lazio.
But Eriksson is a man with little or no respect. Anyone can humiliate him as they please. A manager has to earn respect of his players, something that Eriksson will never be able to do. I dont want him

The only alternatives to Mancini that I would be happy with are VanBasten and Hiddink

 

[snake]

Shahz, lol when will your learn.

and this time i did stop reading after the 2nd line

 

[Kato]

I don't see that kind of guy leading us to the scudetto. The only alternatives to Mancini that would make me happy would be Hiddink or Eriksson.

Now I hope u have a good excuse for that one?! Blindness or stupidity will do

I just don't understand why people think Eriksson would be good for the job, there's enough media crap surrounding Inter as it is without the biggest media joke of the year joining in

 

[catanha]

Sven hardly has the most overrated bunch of English players, he has the best English squad since 66. Yes it is better than the 90' squad, only thing the 1990 squad has on this one is a lethal striker.
Sven is a pathetic coach, for someone who gets paid so much, he is crap.

 

[snake]

I just don't understand why people think Eriksson would be good for the job, there's enough media crap surrounding Inter as it is without the biggest media joke of the year joining in

As ashkan once put it

A coach like Jose would attract the media but then take all the pressure away from his players by taking the spotlight of the media. (or something like that)

 

[Mikkel]

I don't see that kind of guy leading us to the scudetto. The only alternatives to Mancini that would make me happy would be Hiddink or Eriksson.

What The **** you did not just write that

Eriksson that is a joke right, the father of favoritism, besides his coaching abilities is far worse then Mancio and there is no way he would ever bring us the scudetto, he sucks. and that is without mentioning the aspect Katie wrote.

I wouldn't mind Jose since he would give our lazy ass players a lesson or two. and would withdraw the media from them and that would really help allot.

 

[Kato]

As ashkan once put it

A coach like Jose would attract the media but then take all the pressure away from his players by taking the spotlight of the media. (or something like that)

Yeh that's good media.. It's gotta be said that he's a professional when it comes to his job..
Eriksson would just fk up the balance of the team completely, I doubt there'd be much respect for him after all the crap in the past few years.

I just don't like coaches that experiment at the wrong times, Mancini & Eriksson both do this..

Only the special one will do

 

[1919]

Hitzfield wud be a better choice than Eriksson. But i fv not seen any comments on the Hiddink suggestion.

 

[snake]

Eriksson would just fk up the balance of the team

lol thats because only he is stupid enough to be fooled by a so called arab sheik and backstab his players.:wallbang:

Only the special one will do

If your trying to get into my goodbooks, your saying all the right things

 

[Kato]

Oh yeh? lol

I just think he's a bloody good coach, no matter what my feelings for Chelsea are..