2009/2010 Forwards rumours topic

[DARi0]

We don't need Aguero right now, we have a lot of quality strikers. He's definetly good, excellent for his age! Maybe it would be smart to secure his services... He's argentine - i love argentine players for their technique, determination and loyalty! But I would love to see Messi and Tevez playing for INTER.

We should only start thinking about a new striker in the summer of 2009 when Cruz and Crespo get old.

We now should focus on replacing Figo [Quaresma/Menez/Valeri/Mancini]
and to buy a world class AM-playmaker-trequartista like Ronaldinho/Diego.

We should also keep on eye on the Javier Mascherano situation, I rate him one of the best DM and he's also argentine [no need to think about Diarra, Maresca, Sissoko, etc]

 

[Suneet]

Aguero is no tre-quarterista. So we can do without him, for now. He is one for the future.

 

[Pajo]

Yes, one of the future...

And anyway, I don't believe he will come anyway... At least no atm... He is happy aat Atleti, he is really loved there, he is a star... He also earns money, his transfer was payd around 25 mil, if i remember corectly...

 

[Stefan]

I don't agree with you guys.

Cruz only has one season left then he is going back to Argentina unless he changes his mind. Adriano is a goner unless a miracle happens. Crespo at this stage is only a good backup not a starter any more. Suazo hasn't convinced yet and Ballotelli doesn't have the needed xp.

I think Augero would be an excellent and needed signing.

 

[K.I.]

lol if there is a chance to get aguero we should get him...he is an excellent player.

Ibrahimovic
Crespo
Cruz
Aduero
Suazo

I like that alot. Also Aguero can easily play behind 2 strikers.

 

[Luka]

I like that alot. Also Aguero can easily play behind 2 strikers.

He certainly can, but I can see it only as a last resort option. The same, as playing Chivu in midfield.

But that is definetly an advantage.

 

[Suneet]

lol if there is a chance to get aguero we should get him...he is an excellent player.

Ibrahimovic
Crespo
Cruz
Aduero
Suazo

I like that alot. Also Aguero can easily play behind 2 strikers.

He is more Ibra-type player, but I dont think he can play behind the 2 strikers. I'd prefer Dinho/Diego if we are buying a tre-quarterista, not because they are better players, but because they are used to that role.

 

[Pajo]

Oh, but he can... I have seen him last year playing behind Torres and Mista... And he was great, he has vision and he has short pass... He is same good as AMC/SS/CF...

 

[K.I.]

Diego is different than Dinho and Aguero. Diego is more based in midfield and pulling strings from midfield like say Pirlo...Dinho and Aguero are more strikers and attacking midfielders like Kaka and Totti.

 

[shahz_nerazzurri]

Aguero is a quality player, that we dont need right now. He CANNOT play behind two strikers, unless Mancinio goes for a 3 striker system (which will never happen). Aguero usually plays in the same position as Ibrahimovic. While an Ibra-Aguero duo will be one of the most technically gifted in the world, we would still lack a finisher ala Cruz.

Aguero has quality though. I have been really impressed by this guy. We cant get Messi and he is the next best choice. It will be up to Mancini to integrate him in our system, and make sure it doesnt cost us.

What will piss me off, is that if we decide to spend all our budget on him and some DM or something. I wonder how much uncle Moratti has for our cenetary year, but what ever it is, our first priority HAS GOT TO BE one of Quaresma or Diego.

 

[Pajo]

Aguero USUALLY plays at Ibra's postion, but he CAN play behind two strikers... He is like Recoba, who can play behind two strikers... Well, he ain't no playmaker, and that would be too offensive play, but still...

 

[cloudq]

Diego is different than Dinho and Aguero. Diego is more based in midfield and pulling strings from midfield like say Pirlo...Dinho and Aguero are more strikers and attacking midfielders like Kaka and Totti.

im guessing we're talking about 3 different types of playmakers here...

deep lying playmaker ie pirlo ====> diego is not deep lying

trequartista ie kaka, totti, dinho (and does it for barca and brazil) ====> diego is one, aguero can play here, but usually doesnt

forward ie aguero, ibra, tevez, rooney ====> diego is not, dinho can play here, but usually doesnt

 

[Pajo]

Nice post cloudq, although little messi...

 

[Luka]

\Aguero usually plays in the same position as Ibrahimovic. While an Ibra-Aguero duo will be one of the most technically gifted in the world, we would still lack a finisher ala Cruz.

:thumbsup:

But as for Quaresma, I'd say he don't play there, thus it would be too risky to buy him as Figo replacement.

Anyway, I can say, that buying Aguerro won't harm us

For me the dream gift would be Aguerro + Diego. This 2 players would bring the technique, vision, dribbling and creativity that is the last thing I miss in this team. Diego, obviously as a replacement for Figo. Aguerro on the other hand is what I miss in this team, and that is a replacement when Ibra is not playing.

Well 2 of these would be around 50 mln Euros. Come on Mister M. you can do it for us

 

[Pajo]

You want Aguero as replacement?? Man, if Kun comes, he'll be in the first team, together with Ibra, and like you said, we'll lack finisher...

That is the only reason I don't want Aguero here... Maybe when he is 26 and Ibra 32...

 

[Luka]

You want Aguero as replacement?? Man, if Kun comes, he'll be in the first team, together with Ibra, and like you said, we'll lack finisher...

That is the only reason I don't want Aguero here... Maybe when he is 26 and Ibra 32...

Don't rush so fast

I don't want Ibra to go or whatever, that would be crazy.

All I'm saying is that when Ibra is not playing we miss him to much upfront, and his plays. We don't have a player who can do the shit he is doing up there. Suazo is more of a runner, not a technical player, who can hold up ball, dribble, pass etc. Cruz + Crespo, are typical players who finish the sh1t. With Aguerro, we could have an option if Ibra is missing.

That doesn't mean he would sit on the bench, although with Mancini and his rotation, I'm sure everybody would get his chance, and with Aguerro and his characteristics we would have many options how to field our front line.

 

[Pajo]

You don't get me, but I get you...

My word was, Aguero will never accept to be on the bench... Or as a rotation player believe me... If he leaves Atleti, which I doubt, than it will be in big club with GUARANTEED first team.. Which is not case with Inter...

 

[K.I.]

Diego cant play as a trequartista...what the hell are you guys smoking? he is not exactly like pirlo,he is more like riquelme or veron.

Also getting aguero now to be honest will ruin our attack,lets wait and see how crespo does next year and what cruz will do when his contract expires....THEN we could look for another young striker like aguero.

 

[Luka]

My word was, Aguero will never accept to be on the bench... Or as a rotation player believe me... If he leaves Atleti, which I doubt, than it will be in big club with GUARANTEED first team.. Which is not case with Inter...

Ok now I get you.

However... I don't think that he will make such a demands. I think, that yes, he can do it but only in a clubs like Atletico. He is not Pele for god sake. Sure he will want first team football, but I don't think he could say that he wants to play all the time. He would be first team player, but not indispensable like JZ, Cambiasso or Ibrahimovic.

And last, lets not forget to what kind of club he would come play for. We're not some minors, we are italian champions and one of the biggest clubs in the world, and for him coming to Inter would be a big step and a chance to rise his game, and I'm sure he would be aware of that.

To put the demands like that, he would be even more arrogant and selfish player than Jordan once was.

 

[Suneet]

Ibra, Aguero, Crespo, Suazo, Cruz, Balotelli.

The only reason we will sign Aguero is if we will play the 4-3-3 next season.

Actually I think come summer we will be wanting a defender more than a DM. Burdisso and Max havent impressed me at all. Yes I'm biased against Max, but still he hasnt been as good. I think he is the weakest link.